i can't help but think that fmj pretty much has to batter, drop and seriously hurt manny to get the decision. i think he will too...but what f he beats manny convincingly like pea did jcc? there's no guarantee he'll get the decision...if you look at the scores for his recent fights, even when fmj dominates (canelo, maidana, guerrero) there's always some scoring controversy....some idiot judge will call it a draw or something crazy like that. with pac's maniacal following, there might just be enough political motivation to give pac the decision even fmj beats him 9-3...or at least call it a draw like pea-jcc. that way they set up a rematch and the promoters and everybody makes another big payday... for the fans it would suck, but for the business people, it's a best-case scenario.
If FMJ can beat him 9-3 , I would hope everybody would call it a one sided fight no more no less btw I'm going for Pac . I remember the Chavez vs Whitaker decision that night and I was ****ed and trust me I was pulling for Chavez all the way .
i think it will be close enough for the fight to go either way. the first maidana fight could have been a draw or a split decision and i think pac will do much better than maidana did. i understand that styles make fights so a controversial decision either way in order to secure a 2nd fight would not be out of the question. after all this is boxing and nothing ceases to amaze me anymore, just when you think you've seen it all......???????
the first maidana-fmj fight could have gone either way?...thank god you're not a judge for the pac-may fight.
it could have been a split decision like i said i have been watching boxing for years and would not be surprised by any decision, think about it, canelo vs may was a majority decision, maidana did better than canelo did. personally i would have scored maidana vs may a draw because i favor the aggressor.
