Is Mayweather cherrypicking by fighting Pacquiao?

A prime for prime fight between the two was never and has never been realistic.

Mayweather's prime was pre-2007, arguably earlier - he's just so good that he's adjusted his game and his decline still hasn't been enough to see him overtaken. Manny was fighting at super-featherweight in 2007.

Manny's prime was about 2008-2009.

They're still comfortably, along with Wlad, the best boxers on the planet. No question.

 

What? OMG MODS PLEASE I BEG OF YOU BANNED DUMMIES WITH THE DUMBEST POSTS EVER!!!!!

 

You not making even close to a proper sense. So it's not a cherry pick but yet you think pac is the toughest challenge for floyd at ww and the match you and everybody else want to see?

But according to you if floyd wins, it would be a tainted victory cause floyd didnt fight pac at pac best? I'm sorry i thought pac is number 2 p4p, i thought pac is the one that many many say floyd is scared to fight him on may 2nd but when floyd finally did sign to fight him, it's all of a sudden tainted?

Is floyd in his prime at 38 years old? Umm no he isnt. So you got two past prime fighters going at it. <<<<Botton line is this, whoever wins deserves big credit. I'm getting sick and tired of re****ed ppl in this forum that says floyd is scared, coward from the start of 5 years up to now which even before the fight is finally signed, mostly all floyd haters saying (Floyd wont fight Pacquiao on may 2nd cause he's still afraid of Pacquiao.) <<If Pac is shot, then why Floyd is afraid of Pacquiao? atsch

 

damn bro, you owned that CAT!:good:rofl:yep

 

This is like or similar to picking which Jordan to go 1v1 against, Jordan before retirement or Jordan after retirement. Both are still the GOAT, but the Jordan before retirement still had great legs, and the one after not so much.


It's not a cherry pick, but Floyd sure got the timing right. Haha, even he admits it, doe!

 

And roach admit floyd is a "shot" fighter since roach said floyd no longer got young legs which he's saying floyd legs are"shot". So you believe roach like you believe mayweather? atsch

 

You don't like what I wrote so you act like a ***** and whine about roach? Ok doe!

 

I ask a question that if you believe mayweather saying pac is "shot" (when did he ever say that?) then do you believe roach for saying mayweather legs are shot?

 

I already wrote out my opinion that there is a difference between 2009 Pacman vs 2015 Pacman. Hell even Floyd said the timing is right. But you butthurt so I understand doe!

 

Why you ignoring my question? Scared to answer? If Floyd said pacquiao is shot, then roach said floyd is shot. So that means pac vs floyd would be a battle of two "shot" fighters. So you believe roach like you believe mayweather? Answer the question.

 

Did Pac say Floyd is shot? No but Roach did. Floyd Sr, also said Pac is on the a side whatever ****, did that make it so? You obviously not happy with my opinion or anyone else for that matter so why ****ing ask a question dawg?

 

Is roach pac trainer? The one that makes sure pac will only fight a fighter on the best situation like catchweights and other bs so that pac can get advantage?

 

LOL @ the poll....3 pacturds who claimed in feb. that floyd was a coward are now saying pac is shot!!

 

You can hug onto that at night because it keep you warm.

 

Of course this fight would have been at it's beast in 09'-10'. Oh well were still going to get the best two of their era together. Just like SRL and Hagler was a bit late, yet it still proved to be an atg match-up worth re-watching all these years later.