Top Chuck Liddell main events on pay per view Liddell vs Ortiz - UFC 66 - 1,050,000 buys Liddell vs Jackson - UFC 71 - 675,000 buys Liddell vs Franklin - UFC 115 - 520,000 buys Liddell vs Babalu - UFC 62 - 500,000 buys Liddell vs Evans - UFC 88 - 475,000 buys Top Georges St. Pierre main events on pay per view GSP vs Penn II - UFC 94 - 920,000 buys GSP vs Dan Hardy - UFC 111 - 850,000 buys GSP vs Jake Shields - UFC 129 - 800,000 buys GSP vs Josh Koscheck - UFC 124 - 785,000 buys GSP vs Matt Hughes - UFC 70 - 750,000 buys (Liddell/Wanderlei was on the undercard)
You've missed the point entirely, but hey, let's keep throwing numbers around UFC 127 - 260,000 - AUSTRALIA - NO TAPE DELAY UFC 128 - 445,000 UFC 129 - 850,000 UFC 130 - 300,000 UFC 131 - 325,000 UFC 132 - 350,000 UFC 133 - 310,000 UFC 134 - 335,000 UFC 135 - 450,000 UFC 136 - 250,000
Brock Lesnar, Georges St. Pierre, Anderson Silva would be the big three at the moment and all appeal to different parts of the fanbase. Predicting these thing is tricky but Jon Jones has made a good start to his run at 205Ibs and the fight with Rashad if it happens could be the thing that puts him over the top. Chael Sonnen and Nick Diaz both have charisma and could by this point next year be champions, although equally both could screw up. Cain Velasquez, Junior Dos Santos or Alistair Overeem all have the look and the fighting style to be the mean guy who knocks people out you're looking for. While Edgar is something of a bust charisma wise at 155Ibs, the likes of Guida, Henderson, Melendez or Cerrone could all grow into something meaningful if they're able to go on a run with the title. Urijah Faber could be a big-time draw at bantamweight if he can work out a way to defeat Cruz.
What was your point that I missed? I've already said that these year has been a bad one due to injuries (UFC 133, UFC 131, UFC 130) and Frankie Edgar (UFC 136 and UFC 125).
A few people have went full ****** in this thread, particularly Stoo. Trying to talk about how co workers are talking about Liddell. Arent you from Wales? How can you judge how the average American sports fan talks about the current superstars comparing them to a couple of Welsh blokes who watched Liddell? The proof is in the ratings.
I think those guys all have a decent chance of breaking through. With the caveat that they can go on a decent winning run and look impressive doing so
Btw, if the argument was about whether the UFC peaked in the UK I wouldn't disagree with that. They've never recovered from losing Setanta in 2009. They need a new television deal like yesterday.
Because you keep saying, "Who will replace these couple of fighters?" It doesn't matter. It's not about a couple of individual guys any more. The sport has moved beyond that level. It's going to be in the mainstream public consciousness as a legitimate athletic and sporting endeavour now, which is something it's never had in the States before. Five years from now, the UFC will be in the middle of its current network TV deal. We can't predict anything about individual fighters at that time. But we CAN predict, with CERTAINTY, that MMA will have had 5 years of massively increased TV coverage and exposure. It will have been seen by tens of millions more viewers than ever before. It will have new superstars who haven't announced themselves yet. And it will have the first generation of top-rate athletic talents who have been training since the age of 13 specifically to be UFC champions rather than NFL players or collegiate wrestlers. That's why I keep harping on this Fox deal. Because you keep ignoring what it is and what it means. It is an unprecedented guarantee that MMA and specifically the UFC is not only going to stick around, but get much, much bigger. Literally there is nothing better that the UFC could have hoped for than to get a $600 million plus, multi-year primetime network broadcast deal with Fox Sports. Arguing over Chuck on his career-best night getting 200k more PPV buys than GSP is just bull**** nitpicking. You are missing the big picture. :hat
How many times have you moaned about how boring wrestlers are, especially GSP. And how many fighters break through in the UFC without being predominately a wrestler. And how popular is Colliegent wrestling as a spectator sport in the US? They point about Liddell was merely to point that out of 500 co-workers, Ive only heard MMA brought up once, and there was no mention of Jones, GSP, Frankie in ''the fastest growing sport in the WORLD''.They didnt even know there was a UFC being held in England this week. Ive heard Pac v Floyd and Hopkins and the Klictchko's discussed nearly every day though
More than that hopefully the Fox deal is the point where the UFC massively overhauls its presentation, because while I don't think they've peaked they have become massively stale due to not changing how they present their product.
They desperately need to get rid of Buffer. He must be the first to go. But here's a quote from Dana about that very issue. "Coming to Fox now, everything's going to change, including the pay-per-view," said White. "I want to change the look -- the graphics, the show's open, the open for the fight nights. Everything's going to have a different feel to it. There's going to be millions and millions of people seeing the UFC for the first time. It's going to be fun putting this all together over the next few months." :hat
Id agree with that. The only thing I think that doesnt need an overhaul is Rogan doing the colour commentary as he explains the ground game well for those who may be tuning in for the 1st time