Is nathan cleverly a paper champion??

Totally agree, he's a complete fraud. ****** was talking about him fighting cloud, Bhop etc but then lines up a bum so bad for his next fight that the wbo actually rejected him! He's going the calzaghe route, defend loads of times against weak opposition, difference is calzaghe was actually good

 

yes

 

Every single belt he has ever won has been vacant. British, CW, Euro & WBO.

Never beat a champ = paper titlist

 

Kinda not his fault... he IS a really good fighter...

I reckon in a few years he will be primed and a special fighter...:good

 

Frank really ****s over the reputation of his fighters doing this.

 

Duh, of course he is. But nonetheless, they'll keep feeding him bums to build up his record, and he may take on a worthy challenger eventually, but only when they're way past it.

 

i'm not happy with his opposition but don't be mistaken, cleverly wants to fight all the best 175 fighters, and when he does get the chance, he will beat the majority of them as well.

 

He's not as good as he thinks he is, heart & a good engine will only get him so far

His Dad, Vince, is a complete & utter fool & will eventually get his son KFTO

 

He only finished his degree in 2010, only just started taking boxing seriously, shouldn't have a title, but their is someone in almost every division milking a title

 

Yes.

This doesn't made him a bad fighter, or automatically exclude him from the status of being a legitimate contender, though.

 

maths, horrible choice of subject. Degree level maths is just foul.

Hes an unlikely combination of geeky brains and hearty brawn, I'll say that. Its pretty amazing that hes gone from university to a foot in the door of world level boxing.

 

He's a promising fighter but he doesn't deserve a belt and isn't a real champion.

 

i think krasniqi might win this one, lol

 

Good fighter but he hasn't fought anybody. I think he's also a glass jaw waiting to be exposed.:deal