Is Pacquiao Approaching Legendary Status? Comparison to Leonard.

A gift decision gives you nothing, tool.

I said that if Pac wins decisively, clear or by destruction, then he's P4P #1 and you get bragging rights. Instead, the decision went to the wrong man, that's not bragging rights, that's incompetent scoring.

 

Not true. Based on the criteria that you have set forth for "bragging rights" which is basically backing up a fighter who keeps winning and therefore you can brag about it because somehow his accomplishments allows you to feel superior to others who aren't his fans, Amsterdam (a Calzaghe fan, and therefore a fan of an unbeaten fighter) has more bragging rights than you. As do all Mayweather fans.

 

nahhhh. sore loser. they just took your boys belt

This content is protected

 

:yep

Mayweather fans have plenty more bragging rights.

P4P no. 1, best fighter of the generation
6 world titles, 5 weight division
and most importantly, UNDEFEATED

 

How the **** do you get bragging rights? Did you fight Amsterdam for the title?

 

we dont win sissy wins. we mix it with KD/TKO. and that constitute a part of bragging rights. 3 mexicos elite. still member of top ten pound per pound. total of 10 Plus KD/TKO. nough said :good

 

i dont care about PBF. he's my number 1.
they are different.

 

Was Morales still top 10 p4p after Raheem's schooling?

Did Pac really beat JMM?

:think

 

No no no.....you don't get to add onto it now.

And even if you did, we would hold LOSSES and close controversial decisions against you:deal So that would diminish your "bragging rights". Like I said, you don't have any in this instance. Don't be pissed because your own pseudo superiority came back to bite you in the ass. Sissy wins....perhaps you didn't see Calzaghe vs Lacy or Calzaghe vs Kessler.

Also, Calzaghe's 20 title defenses, dominance of his weight class, etc. And with Mayweather....lol, you're just outgunned.

 

So wait?

Who's the bragging rights too?

This whole thing confuses me...:huh

 

when pac lost the fisrt time, em went back to low top 10.
and the rest was history

 

He didn't beat Marquez in 2 fights mate, I don't care what the little SD decision says, it was not a decisive victory, it's a win on paper.

So add two old Mexican former elite's and a paper win over an aging Mexican elite.

Also add 1 loss to 1 old Mexican former elite. Bozo.:good

 

When pac lost the first time, this was BEFORE the Raheem schooling. So I ask again, was EM still in the top ten p4p after the Raheem schooling (not just beating, SCHOOLING)?

I didn't, that's for sure.

 

And then he lost to Raheem. AFTER that. If he was still top 10 after that, well then someone isn't very bright.

 

i know Kg, but the way he analyzed it still has basis. Its his opinion, not facts. Didnt warrant the reaction that Asians are ****ed up:huh




sorry, must have touched a very sensitive nerve in me.:nono