Does it matter???? Did Roach know or did he not know DLH was shot??? Did Roach train DLH or did he not train DLH??? Did Roach say or did he not say DLH was pretty much done as a fighter??? So of course DLH was handpicked, we the public did not know how bad he was, but Roach did, furthermore, he knew making him come in at 147, a weight DLH had not made in a decade would hinder Oscar even more. We the public didn't realize how ****ed up Oscar was at that point. We should have, with the sparring stories, and how he worked his ass off to get a W against Forbes.
like this one. :yep http://www.eastsideboxing.com/forum/showthread.php?t=108475&highlight=uliuli&page=43
That's not the point. He couls have had 90% KO ratio, but the FACT that his KO ratio has increased or stayed the same is suspect.
well take into account that he fought Morales three times (ATG chin), Marquez twice (never been stopped from Featherweight to Welterweight), Barrera twice. Remove those 3 guys from the equation and Pac's KO percentage from his 14th fight to his move up to LW is well above 80% Alot of people don't know that every one of Pac's wins at 122 came by way of KO. And that in the last 10 years there isn't a fighter who went the full distance with Pacquiao who hasn't been knocked down by him. So its not suspect that he is still getting alot of knockouts. I mean he is so much better p4p than these others guys he's facing (Hatton, Diaz, Oscar, Cotto) that it should almost be expected. In four fights that were scheduled to go 12 rounds each, he's only lost 1 round in total. Like I said his technical game and defense are very underrated.
What excuses will the *******s who say Pac will win What excuses will the *******s who say Pac will win have if Pac loses? UliUli The Legendery "IsaL" East Side VIP http://www.eastsideboxing.com/forum/showthread.php?t=108475 hahaha
Did you know DLH was shot?, did the public know DLH was shot? Yes, they all did yet all of them, yourself included, picked DLH to crush Pacquiao in three rounds at most in a brutal circus of a fight which is based on money and only money. Wasn't Pacquiao a HUGE underdog going in?, didn't you also think it's a joke for Pacquiao to think money first and only money for taking this fight expecting him, like everyone else, to lose? Now that he won it doesn't matter, huh?. Didn't DLH have a HUGE size advantage and everyone thought that all alone would be enough to destroy Pacquiao?. Roach took a risk, a major one, regardless of what you think he "knew" and took a lot of criticism and hate for it. Instead of giving them credit you **** on him now especially when you were the first to say Pac will be carried out on a stretcher when the fight is over? If it was Chavez Jr. scoring that victory you would have it printed on your no color printer and stamped on your ass for eternity. By the way, your hero Chavez "the tomato can ambassador" Sr. was one of the people that disgraced DLH for such a fight and said the Mexican people will be cheering for Pacquiao while he also predicted an "unfair" victory for DLH.