What do you guys think? Stylistically and skill wise they’re both very different but they share a similar career path. Pac was a wild, offensive beast in his younger years, like Duran. Both heavily improved on their skills and defense to become more well rounded. Both also moved up many weight classes and fought the very best fighters, took some bad losses along the way to the point that many didn’t think that they had anymore in the tank. Both were also heavily underestimated and still gave scintillating performances against good fighters even while past their prime. Pacquiao, I think, has earned the right to be mentioned in the same breathe as other past ATGs such as Roberto Duran. Probably not as great as Duran but pretty damn close.
Yes, they do have a similar career path. Duran was very unlucky to not get the wins over Pazienza x2 and Camacho, as an old man. Pacquaio is not as great as Roberto, though.
without a doubt. nobody else comes close. when you got legends like jcc and mab calling you a top 2 atg, even accounting for the hyperbole, it says a lot about you.
Manny isn`t as great as Duran but would have destroyed Camacho and Paz at the age of 40, he is far better than those two at 147+ no matter what the ages.
What make a great fighter is the ability to bounce back even after being on the downslope. No one believed Pacquiao could come back after getting KO’d by JMM or be able to still hang in there with the young fighters at his age. Duran had his share of having his career in doubt but he still went ahead anyways after bad losses to SRL, Benitez, Laing, Hagler, Hearns, etc. It really does show that having losses doesn’t hurt your legacy as long as you keep moving forward and proving people wrong
Not at welter and not at the age Camacho was at when he ran away from Duran all night, Manny would have landed much more punches than Camacho did v Duran, Thurman would have beaten Camacho also.