Is Pacquiao's loss GOOD for boxing or not?

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by hofbrau, Jun 11, 2012.


  1. hofbrau

    hofbrau Well-Known Member Full Member

    2,944
    0
    Mar 20, 2011
  2. m8te

    m8te Oh you ain't know? Full Member

    10,224
    2
    May 28, 2009
    what kind of question is this? he was blatantly ****ing robbed how could it possibly be good for boxing?
     
  3. miniq

    miniq FURY COMETH 2026 Full Member

    48,709
    28,805
    Oct 23, 2011
    A fight bieng judges wrong is not good for boxing

    Arum getting his greedy way is not good boxing

    Fans bieng robbed is not good for boxing
     
  4. Arcane

    Arcane One More Time Full Member

    15,277
    20
    Oct 23, 2010
    How about we discuss the exact moment your father failed to pull out in time and how all these years later this thread happened to be just one of the results of that mistake.
     
  5. xizor

    xizor Well-Known Member Full Member

    2,346
    1
    Oct 25, 2010
    I was woundering the same thing. I mean i have not felt something for boxig since the Mayweather Ortiz fight.
     
  6. gobblock

    gobblock Boxing Addict banned

    5,623
    1
    Mar 20, 2009
    Indirectly, yeah.
     
  7. anundecidedarm

    anundecidedarm Active Member Full Member

    812
    0
    Oct 23, 2011
    one of the worst things to happen.
     
  8. m8te

    m8te Oh you ain't know? Full Member

    10,224
    2
    May 28, 2009
    indirectly huh? how?
     
  9. gobblock

    gobblock Boxing Addict banned

    5,623
    1
    Mar 20, 2009
    It's bad for the image of boxing, but decreased clout could lead to less cautious management of Pacqhrist's career, more competitive matchups for him in the future, and less leverage when it comes to picking the weight limit of his future fights--no more fighting for titles at catch weights, I can only hope.
     
  10. m8te

    m8te Oh you ain't know? Full Member

    10,224
    2
    May 28, 2009
    he was robbed though, and most people, including his fans, agree with that. what you just said would only really apply if he lost his main bargaining chip, his selling power.
     
  11. gobblock

    gobblock Boxing Addict banned

    5,623
    1
    Mar 20, 2009
    It hurts him just like it hurt JMM when he was robbed. Robberies damage a fighter's clout and bargaining capital, and getting a gift decision increases a fighter's money-making prospects the vast majority of the time--even if everyone agrees it was a shitty decision. This loss hurt Pacquiao's power outside of the ring and his chances of ever getting purse parity against Floyd.
     
  12. m8te

    m8te Oh you ain't know? Full Member

    10,224
    2
    May 28, 2009
    other than the loss hurting pacquiao's power at the mayweather bargaining table, everything else remains to be seen, especially since he was disgracefully robbed.
     
  13. Julien Sorel

    Julien Sorel New Member Full Member

    30
    2
    Dec 19, 2011
    Maybe people will finally let go of the pac vs floyd thing and focuss on other fighters/fights as well, in that way it is good.
    But to have a huge star lose in such a controversial way cant be good in the eyes of many casuals who dont see this **** every month like us fans do.
     
  14. JabCross727

    JabCross727 Well-Known Member Full Member

    2,912
    124
    Jun 14, 2008
    Whether or it not the loss involved Pacquiao, a ROBBERY is never good for the sport of boxing. Period.