Is Pacquiao's ring age truly more than Mayweather's?

The "Pretty" in Pretty Boy Floyd's name gives us a clue. He has hardly been hurt in his career. He's had less tear ups and wars. A hell of a lot of his fights Floyd has pretty much coasted through rounds and won with ease. You can argue about the level of competition between the two, but Manny has been in more wars, which in tern ages a fighter.

 

Truth of the matter is it is just dumbass excuses made by idiots

 

Of course you see.

 

Look, man. You THINK you're a slickster. But I know exactly what you're asking. The answer is no. And your thread subject is confusing vs. the question in the body of the post.



All around, it's bad wording and demonstrates your lack of a formal education.

:rofl

 

get a hint, ring age is what matter in boxing :good

 

NO, Pac's ring age is not more than Floyd's. Once again, EXCUSES! Pac's going to get his butt kicked because he's overrated. Never seen so many coward fans making excuses for their idol after all the talk that Floyd was the one scared.

 

By your logic, MAB and Morales were both prime when he beat them on their last fights. After all, they were both younger than Pac. Hatton was also prime, again, younger than Pac.

I don't mean to be rude but, are you by any chance re****ed?