is pavlik undisputed?

And rightly so, because neither Calzaghe nor Kessler will be undisputed no matter who wins. To become the first undisputed champ you have to hold the WBC, WBA and IBF titles at the same time, meaning the winner will have to beat Bute/Berrio to become the first undisputed SMW champion. Something that would not have been necessary if Calzaghe had hold on to the IBF title instead of fighting Manfredo.:roll:

 

not really. my definition of undisputed is, your claim to the championship is regarded as legitimate. i just made a new post about it, but were thinking along the same lines it's just the word play that have us confused.

 

Believe what you want to believe, but let me ask you this, when have the majority ever ruled?

 

to cut down on all this confusion, all sanctioning bodies should be abolished. oe world wide organization should take over.

 

Do they really, or do they think they do?

 

I think all of us would agree about that.:good

 

I don't believe in conspiracy theories myself. I was talking plain old politics.

 

Right. With so many alphabet belts out there stripping fighter, how can anyone be undesputed for long.

Pavlik beat the real undisputed champion last night. He is now the un-defeated and undisputed champion at middle weight.

 

gotcha. thats how i define it.

 

does the npd have a significant following over there? did'nt they win some seats for representation in meclenburg or was it saxony last year. that made some waves in the news.

 

And what if after having won this supposed election these partys should decide Germany should help in some war, and the majority of the German citizens disagreed, what do you think the decision would be? Try to ask some of our American friends or the Danes for that matter.

The majority rule at election day, the governing partys rule rest of the time.

But let us get back to boxing.

 

Yep, and luckily so.