overrated in atg yes , but skill no The man had a chance to become a legend now win or lose against Pac he is still lesser
hmm may be they are at the top 100 best boxers but not on the top 10 based on the top 10.com all of the boxers in the top ten are all KO kings! ali pacman rocky tyson chavez sugarray robinsin roy jones joe luis salvador sanches trinidad now what? is KO important in a boxers career?
KO's can help sell you as a fighter to the general public. The casuals who LOVE a mean KO. They are NOT a criteria of greatness.
Pep isnt top 10 ATG?Then you have the nerve to have Chavez,tito,Pac,marciano, Ahead of whitaker? Never mind Pep and Whitaker beat great fighters and did great things.:-( atschatschatschatsch
Trinidad? Salvador Sanchez? Rocky Marciano? Tyson? Top 10?????????!!!!!!!!!!!! Kid, I'll give you a pass because you seem like your very young, but you obviously need to read up and study some history before trying to make arguments. Otherwise you will continue to sound like you have absolutely no idea what you're talking about. The point of boxing is to win; to hit and not be hit. You can rack up a lot of KO's, but that isn't not the determinant of one's particularly greatness. If that was the case, Big George Foreman would have been rated waaaaayyyyyy above Muhammad Ali in terms of P4P. What you're trying to argue (heavily correlating KO % with P4P status) makes no sense. That's the boxing equivalent of me saying that Dominique Wilkens was better than Larry Bird because he had much more dunks and highlights. KO's are like icing on the cake. A fighter's skill set, abilites, experience, resume and intangibles are the actual ingredients for building that cake.
ok ok.. i might be young compared to the other members here but can someone please link a website for me to know who are the god damn best fighter in the world today! pleaseeeee
here is a link where you could find he BEST POUND 4 POUND ever. take a look at their KO% im not arguing that KO is they keyfactor to become "great fighter" i was talking about P4P. and i stand firm that to be able to become the best P4P KO is really important! tell me who among those p4p kings arent KO puncher!:nut pacman isnt there yet but after he beats PBF hell be the best p4p in the history of boxing!! NO DOUBT This content is protected
I agree with the guy who says PBF's just overhyped. He's a great fighter, I just wished he fought more fighters who are in his natural weight class.
^^ hes not going to do that! hes not going to fight a boxer in his weight class. hes a businessman and not a fighter!
Ko's dont make you great nor do they make you p4p. Ko' for damn sure dont make you an ATG. The list you posted is absolute **** the fact that you posted it speaks volumes. :-(
Winning 6 belts in 5 weight classes and being 18-0 in title fights. Doing this to a P4P #4 and future hofer [yt]iB_-T1_uAJM&feature=related[/yt]
6 time champ on 5 weights victories over: Hernedez Corrales Castillo twice Gatti Judah Baldomir DLH Hatton The best 130lber to lace em up
^^^ honestly im not impressed! like many people says hes overhyped. son of mayweather senior, undefeated etc.. the punches are not solid. look what pacman did to hatton! hatton was not yet tired when he caught him he cant even stand for 3min! but hatton was really exhausted when PB caught him. anyway PBF is still a talented boxer i just hate him when runs like a chicken inside the ring.