Is PBF vs Castillo1 the WORST Robbery of 2000's?

**** off *******

 

You call Castillo/Mayweather the worst robbery? That was just a close fight which I wish Mayweather would of lost, just like the close fights i.e. Williams/Martinez I which could go either way.

Have you seen Paul Williams vs Erislandy Lara? :think Now that is the WORST robbery!!!!!

 

same as my score. it was only seen as robbery because of the wide scores for floyd but either one winning is no problem. should have been a draw.

 

i can't remember who i scored the last round since i last saw this fight about 4 years ago. i still have my excel score in my other computer and i can only remember that i scored it 113-113 with 1 point deduction each. also, i have scored the first 3 or 4 rounds for floyd and castillo has done a magnificent work inside that made the fight close and at one point i think he was ahead. would try to re-watch and re-score this fight again soon.

 

Are you suggesting Maidana beat Khan??

WHY?

 

Yup, a draw would have been good.

Out of interest in something i haven't thought of before, if mayweather had a draw on his record would he still be undefeated :think:think

 

No. Not a robbery. Mayweather won fair and square.

 

of course yes. but based from floyd's logic, someone already has his blueprint if it was a draw.

 

You're either an idiot, or really don't know the difference between a close fight that can go either way, and a robbery. 4 of the 5 fights you listed were close fights - not robberies (DLH/Sturm was clearly a robbery).

Malignaggi/Diaz; Williams/Lara; Mosley/DLH II; are closer to being robberies in the 2000's.

 

You guys are making it seem like Castillo whipped Floyd ass. B.S. Castillo was the aggresser, but Floyd clearly had the better clean shots. That's what gave him the fight. People get over it, he didn't loose.

 

Mayweather benefitted from two robberies, DLH and Castillo. Only the most deluded *****'s will repudiate this fact.