is Pernel Whitaker Overrated?

Discussion in 'Classic Boxing Forum' started by ushvinder, Oct 31, 2012.


  1. ushvinder

    ushvinder Active Member Full Member

    646
    1
    Oct 30, 2012
    I would easily say manny's win over barrera has more value than whitakers win over nelson, especially when you consider the weight class each fight was at. Again nelson is being put on a higher pedastol than he should be due to him being a pernell whitaker opponents. The same re-occuring theme on esb, if you fight pernell, you get overrated to the moon, fight mayweather and your a bum.

    Sure Whitaker hung in there with Tito, but what did he really show from a skills perspective? That from hurtado, pestriaev and trinidad fights his head movement and speed were basically gone by age 33. I laugh everytime i watch the hurtado fight, complete reversal of roles. Hurtado had the speed and boxing ability of camacho, whitaker was slower than foreman and had to try and stalk him. Pernell in the hurtado fight was made to look like a bum, really sad to see him decline that fast.

    You know fighters like napoles and pacquiao have better resumes than whitaker, so the only argument is to cherry pick whitaker having fewer blemishes, damn that seems like the floyd mayweather argument.:lol:

    Either way, im arguing pernell with his biggest die hard lunatic fan, we'll see whos considered greater between pea and pac 10 years from now. I think that will be fairly obvious. If i asked 10 different boxers which one is greater, its almost a guarantee 7 of them will say pac, esb is just butthurt because manny these last 5 years has been surpassing many of thier heroes.
     
  2. kingfisher3

    kingfisher3 Boxing Addict Full Member

    6,460
    1,841
    Sep 9, 2011

    blah blah, bull****, bull****, blah blah, you boring, and you wrong

    pac has achieved some great things, but he is no where near whitaker's skill level.
     
  3. KuRuPT

    KuRuPT Boxing Junkie Full Member

    8,462
    2,814
    Aug 26, 2011
    He actually didn't concede what you'd like.. S.S. correctly stated Whitaker is rated higher than Napoles... He just said Napoles had the overall better wins... but when you mix in his losses.. he isn't ranked as high.
     
  4. KuRuPT

    KuRuPT Boxing Junkie Full Member

    8,462
    2,814
    Aug 26, 2011
    I stand by said statement... YOU SAID people in that range would give whitaker a "SOUND BEATING" Which fighter in Whitaker's Prime EVER EVER gave him a sound beating... You know the answer NONE. In fact, in his prime, he beat great fighters with so much ease... you now come on here pissed off people like him so much. Duh!!

    Now... WHICH fighters give a prime whitaker a sound beating in his prime between those weights?
     
  5. ushvinder

    ushvinder Active Member Full Member

    646
    1
    Oct 30, 2012
    Whats correct in stating whitaker is rightly rated higher than napoles? He deserves to be seen as greater because he has more of a cherry picking resume, while napoles fought in an era where you fight 8-10x a year and every great back then had losses. I guess whitaker is above homicide hank, i mean armstrong lost many times at every stage of his career.

    Napoles in an hbo contract era would have easily beaten everyone whitaker faced from 85-96, EVERYBODY. Whitaker's resume is the most overrated resume of all times.

    I would always favour pryor to beat whitaker at 140 and soundily. Pryor would have no respect for whitakers power and would swarm him all night long. You disagree, good for you, theres no way of proving it. I would also pick napoles to be a 60/40 favourite at either 135 or 140. Napoles was denied lightweight title shots for a reason, duva wouldnt want to have anything to do with napoles.
     
  6. ushvinder

    ushvinder Active Member Full Member

    646
    1
    Oct 30, 2012
    If Whitaker won his lightweight belt off Julio Cesar Chavez and then his following 7 fights were against:
    Mosley at lightweight
    Carlos Ortiz at lightweight
    Floyd Mayweather at lightweight
    De Jesus at lightweight
    Pryor at 140
    Meldrick at 140
    Antonio Cervantes at 140

    You see him going 7-0 against that group and not once losing an 8-4 decision? I never knew beating nelson, chavez and mcgoose makes someone invincible. I didnt even throw in other goat '135/140 size' fighters like duran, napoles, ike williams, joe gans, benny leonard, barney ross, homicide hank, beau jack, bob montgomery. Your argument that no one soundily beats him is an epic troll job.
     
  7. Flea Man

    Flea Man มวยสากล Full Member

    82,426
    1,467
    Sep 7, 2008
    Frankie Gavin, active pro' and Olympian four years ago, bases everything on Whitaker, his 'hero'.

    You think he'd be more of a Pacquiao fan. It's 'his era' after all.

    There's at least one fighter who has posted in his thread who ranks Sweet Pea higher.

    I wonder what Roy Jones' answer would be?
     
  8. KuRuPT

    KuRuPT Boxing Junkie Full Member

    8,462
    2,814
    Aug 26, 2011
    Yeah, I actually think he wins ALL those fights.. and some VERY easily at that. I see NOONE on that list giving Pea a "sound beating" as you claim. Beat him maybe.. but nobody.. nobody in Pea's prime ever gave him a sound beating.
     
  9. Flea Man

    Flea Man มวยสากล Full Member

    82,426
    1,467
    Sep 7, 2008
    Man, Shane Mosley, De Jesus and Meldrick Taylor sure look out of place there.
     
  10. ushvinder

    ushvinder Active Member Full Member

    646
    1
    Oct 30, 2012
    Even though de jesus has a win over duran, let me guess you have an excuse for that win too. Duran was unprepared, it was at 140? Go ahead make an excuse, thats all boxing fans do when a great losses, make excuses.
     
  11. ushvinder

    ushvinder Active Member Full Member

    646
    1
    Oct 30, 2012
    Yeah too bad cervantes is better than almost everyone whitaker has beaten.
     
  12. ushvinder

    ushvinder Active Member Full Member

    646
    1
    Oct 30, 2012
    Yeah and thats why I take your opinion with a grain of salt. Sure pernell looked invincible against the ramirez, haugens, pinedas, diazs, paezs, lomelis, braziers, nazarios, cardonas, jacobs. He is now all of a sudden going 8-0 against all time greats. Mayweather gets ripped apart for being a cherry picker, whitaker gets loved for it.

    Pryor always beats whitaker, i have little to no doubt about it. So does napoles.

    Flea says meldrick looked out of place, well meldrick tko'd mcgirt and was beating chavez before a controversial stoppage, and those are the two best guys whitaker beat.:lol:

    The best fighters on pernells resume, one was stopped by meldrick taylor, the other was going to lose to taylor if it wasnt for richard steele stepping in. But pernell easily goes 8-0 against hall of famers.
     
  13. lufcrazy

    lufcrazy requiescat in pace Full Member

    81,532
    21,916
    Sep 15, 2009
    Whittaker > Pacquiao.

    Infact JMM > Pacquiao.

    If JMM was more marketable he'd have surpassed Pac in every measureable way, as it is he'll just have to settle for beating him 4 times on my cards.
     
  14. KuRuPT

    KuRuPT Boxing Junkie Full Member

    8,462
    2,814
    Aug 26, 2011
    Huh? Pryor actually has the least chance to beat him next to cervantes.. Whitaker was at his best against pressure fighters.. He was their kryptonite... No way pryor beats him.. in fact... pryor would be made to look like a few classes below. Take my opinion with a grain of salt? That is ironic coming from you. You said Whitaker would take "SOUND BEATINGS" Something a prime whtaker NEVER took. Even a past his prime.. coked up... out of his weight class Whtaker never really took a sound beating besides Felix.. Yet I'm supposed to believe a prime whitaker takes a few... Sorry bud, don't buy it.
     
  15. Flea Man

    Flea Man มวยสากล Full Member

    82,426
    1,467
    Sep 7, 2008
    No. Pacquiao has the better resume and achievements.