Is Ray Mercer overrated? If so WHY?

Discussion in 'Classic Boxing Forum' started by HistoryZero26, Jul 14, 2025 at 3:20 PM.


  1. Dubblechin

    Dubblechin Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    24,530
    18,238
    Jun 25, 2014
    To help you understand, I think a recent person whose career was similar to Ray Mercer's, in my opinion, was Joe Joyce.

    But Mercer's career was Joyce's "squared."

    Mercer won Olympic Gold for the US in 1988. If I'm not mistaken, Mercer was one of, if not the oldest gold medal winning boxer from the US ever, at that point.

    Mercer turned pro at 28. That was OLD for the time. Mike Tyson, the champion, was like 23. Holyfield, the top contender, was younger, too, and already five years into his pro career. It was a relatively young heavyweight division.

    So Mercer was fast tracked by his manager, Marc Roberts. Roberts was a young promoter who started Triple Threat Boxing promotions and signed Mercer, Charles Murray and Alfred Cole, who were all Olympians or Olympic alternates. Roberts took Mercer and Cole quickly to world title shots.

    Basically, all of Mercer's pro fights in 1989, except for the Ocasio fight, which was on the Duran-Leaonard III undercard, were televised on ESPN when everyone watched boxing on ESPN. Mercer sometimes fought twice a month in his first year. Everyone watched him progress. After one year, he was already knocking on the door of the top 10.

    In year two, his nationally televised fight in the US against Bert Cooper was a fight of the year candidate.

    And in less than two years after turning pro Mercer headlined his first PPV when he fought Francesco Damiani, who won the silver medal in the 1984 Olympics, for the WBO belt, which Mercer won by KO.

    Next up was Tommy Morrison, who was a huge boxing star in his own right, maybe bigger than Mercer, as Morrison just starred in Rocky V.

    Still, Mercer scored one of the most brutal KOs in heavyweight history over Morrison.

    However big Joe Joyce's win over Dubois was in the UK, Mercer's win over Morrison was far bigger than that at the time.

    Mercer and Roberts were a close pair. Roberts had taken Triple Threat public, in an effort to recoup the money he'd invested in the three fighters. One of the guys who came on board was a Wall Street guy who, after Mercer knocked out Morrison, kind of took over the company and pushed Roberts to the background.

    The Wall Street guy took over all the major decisions, the first being to have Mercer vacate the WBO belt rather than fight Michael Moorer, his top contender in 1992. (Mercer probably would've won that fight, at that point.) Instead, the Wall Street guy wanted Mercer to drop the belt and fight old Larry Holmes, who had mounted a comeback. I can't remember the Wall Street guy's name, but he's standing behind Mercer when he loses to Holmes (and everyone else), usually with a dumb grin on his face.

    Pushing out Roberts tended to derail Mercer. He stated before the Holmes fight on USA, with Moorer in front of him, that he would've preferred to fight Moorer. He didn't want to vacate or fight old Holmes.

    So, unlike Joyce, who started getting bounced around and stopped, Mercer just started suffering one embarrassing decision loss after another. First to Holmes, then to Jesse Ferguson. Then appeared to lose to Marion Wilson, but was gifted a draw.

    Mercer was sort of forgotten for a while. He was supposed to fight Frank Bruno at Wembley in 1994, but the card was cancelled the day of the fight. He got a match with the comebacking Evander Holyfield and put up a solid effort. That got him the Lewis fight, which impressed many on a big HBO Night of the Heavyweights card. Then he decisioned Witherspoon.

    But, by that point, there were just too many guys in front of him. He was supposed to fight Andrew Golota, but that fell through.

    Mercer was a real force early on, but people who remember him from those early days do tend to overrate him overall because he came out of the gate so fast, was really a household name in the US rather quickly, casual boxing fans knew Ray Mercer and liked his fights, and went on a tear for about three years.

    Circling back, Joe Joyce was older, but if you want an idea of how Mercer was viewed on the way up, it was kind of like that. But Mercer did it during a more exciting time in the sport at heavyweight, when more eyes were on the heavyweights than today.

    And now that Joyce has lost to Zhang, Chisora and the like, if Joyce were to somehow come back and fight a couple of top heavyweights close (I don't think he will, but I'm just giving an example), the fans who touted him early on would probably jump back on the bandwagon and start propping him up again.

    That's kind of what happened with Mercer when he came back and had good fights with Evander, Lewis, and Spoon.
     
    Last edited: Jul 15, 2025 at 9:45 AM
  2. Barrf

    Barrf Boxing Addict Full Member

    5,018
    7,640
    Sep 19, 2021
    With the full view of his career, it makes sense he'd struggle against Holmes. Mercer shined against KO-based fighters and fighters who like a war. His chin and toughness tailor him for that.

    A man who doesn't fight like that, isn't going to fight that kind of fight? Mercer has to fall back on his skills. And he was good, but not great. Holmes got him with his "stand in the corner so I don't have to chase around this young guy" strategy. Both men standing at mid-range with feet planted? Old Holmes was still elite under those specific circumstances. Proved it when he was getting the best of Holyfield under the same circumstances.
     
    Overhand94 likes this.
  3. TheMikeLake

    TheMikeLake Well-Known Member Full Member

    2,360
    1,073
    Jun 17, 2013
    I've never really thought of Mercer as overrated personally, but I think if people do think he's overrated, it's largely due to his close losses compared to his best wins. I couldn't find the write-up I did on it, but I thought Mercer beat Lewis, for what that's worth. I think Mercer had the world at his fingertips after beating Morrison, but then he immediately lost to an old Holmes, and decisively.

    I mean I can start to change my own mind just based on my previous paragraph, lol .

    A fun exercise is to look at a fighter's best five wins and when you get after Morrison, things get a little thin.

    Morrison
    Witherspoon
    Cooper
    Damiani
    Darenell Wilson?

    I don't know, interesting question by OP
     
    Jakub79 and Overhand94 like this.
  4. Philosopher

    Philosopher Active Member Full Member

    1,328
    2,046
    Aug 10, 2024
    Thanks for this post, very helpful for those who might not have your knowledge
     
  5. Jakub79

    Jakub79 Active Member Full Member

    896
    976
    Mar 3, 2024
    He's often quite clearly behind Holyfield, Bowe, Lewis, and is treated equally with Ruddock, Moorer, Tua, and Sanders. He certainly had the potential for a better resume. I think he won in 1996 against Lewis, considered the best heavyweight of the time, but I think he lost to Whiterspoon, considered irrelevant at the time. Wins against Morrison and Damiani are good wins, regardless of Ray's poor start. Morrison was very strong at the time and, in my opinion, never recovered from the Mercer fight. Ferguson was an underrated young man, like Ross Purritty. It's a shame Mercer didn't get Golota in 1997. I think he would have had a third good white fighter under his belt. Just like I think he would have easily beaten Tyson in 2002 when they were supposed to meet... unfortunately injuries complicated his career
     
    Last edited: Jul 15, 2025 at 10:37 AM
    Turnip mk3 and Overhand94 like this.
  6. Paul McB

    Paul McB Member Full Member

    300
    566
    Apr 28, 2023
    I’ve found that he’s one of many boxers who seem better in my imagination and memory than when I rewatch their fights decades later.
     
    Dubblechin likes this.
  7. mr. magoo

    mr. magoo VIP Member Full Member

    50,629
    24,114
    Jan 3, 2007
    In hindsight its easy to see that but at the time I and many others thought Holmes was going to get killed
     
  8. OddR

    OddR Well-Known Member Full Member

    1,518
    1,555
    Jan 8, 2025
    He doesn't strike me as either underrated or overrated.
     
    MaccaveliMacc likes this.
  9. The Professor

    The Professor Socialist Ring Leader Staff Member

    24,842
    17,802
    Sep 29, 2008
    Yeah, I agree. He was a decent contender in a top era of HWs who ran hot and cold, and is pretty much seen as exactly that by most people I think.
     
    OddR likes this.
  10. NoNeck

    NoNeck Pugilist Specialist

    25,717
    16,639
    Apr 3, 2012
    Damiani was his best win.
     
  11. Turnip mk3

    Turnip mk3 Active Member Full Member

    909
    980
    Feb 6, 2021
    The thing with Mercer is he didn't fear anyone. He didn't give a ****
     
  12. Mark Anthony

    Mark Anthony Internet virgin Full Member

    7,303
    3,381
    May 17, 2023
    Rocky V underperformed at the box office, grossing $120 million worldwide, making it the lowest-grossing film of the franchise.
     
  13. HistoryZero26

    HistoryZero26 Boxing Addict Full Member

    3,923
    3,437
    Jan 6, 2024
    If hes treated better than Moorer IMO that means hes overrated. Moorer was a multi time champion with defenses.

    I think Golota is clearly a level above as well.
     
    Philosopher likes this.
  14. HistoryZero26

    HistoryZero26 Boxing Addict Full Member

    3,923
    3,437
    Jan 6, 2024
    I just chalk up Joyce mania to him beating green Dubois and Parker. Especially if the person is really high on Parker I don't agree with Joyce mania either though. But I do understand.

    I guess the Olympic thing kinda explains it? The Olympics were a big deal and I can see winning that making you the heir apparent given the then recent history there. Recently did some research on Tyson odds and saw how Biggs got respect from bettors he probably didn't deserve because of the Olympics. But I feel thats more an explanation for when Mercer was fighting. I don't think we're at a place right now where the posters on this site really care about someone winning the Olympics. We've had multiple threads where it has to be explained why Eastern bloc people don't go pro until they've had a full Olympic career.

    You think Ray Mercer would have defeated Michael Moorer? I don't get that. I can see him putting up a good fight winning a few rounds but wouldn't expect him to win.
     
  15. Dubblechin

    Dubblechin Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    24,530
    18,238
    Jun 25, 2014
    In early 1992, most certainly.

    Mercer was on a roll with the Damiani and Morrison wins. If he kept the WBO belt and defended against Moorer (which would mean Marc Roberts was still running his career) I think his professional boxing career would've gone much differently.

    Successful defenses over two unbeaten, young, rising heavyweight bangers would've probably led Mercer to a four-belt unification with Evander later that year.

    In early 1992, Moorer wasn't exactly lighting up the world himself. His knockout streak finally ended with Mike "The Giant" White going the distance with him. And Bigfoot Martin dropped Moorer on the seat of his pants.

    Styles make fights. I think it would've been an excellent punchout. And I think Mercer had a much better chin. And Mercer had all the momentum going.

    Mercer not fighting Moorer certainly changed heavyweight history, IMO.

    People talk a lot about certain fighters losing a trainer or manager and how it impacts them severely. But they never bring up Mercer. Losing his manager, vacating his WBO belt, not fighting Moorer, and then turning in an uninspired performance against Holmes and LOSING was just a trainwreck that he never recovered from. Calamitous is the word.
     
    Philosopher, Overhand94 and Jakub79 like this.