No fighter or fight is PPV worthy on any channel that is already funded through customer subscriptions. Can understand charging non subscribers PPV should they want to watch the odd fight.
In absolutely no universe would that be a PPV. And for the record Broner absolutely smokes Burns in a beating more one sided than Broner-Rees.
That subscription money goes to all the sports across the channel. You know that. Some fights just cant be made without PPV. But on topic with the thread, no, this isnt PPV in the slightest.
That is why subscribers should not be charged again mate. If the fights cannot be made because the fighters are too greedy then don't make them.
Gavin is ng for burns if he gets to 140 That would be his easiest shot at a couple of straps maybe imo
Probably won't be but it probably should be Boxers deserve higher pay days and if they are risking a lot which Burns is. I personally think he will get hammered. If is is a good undercard then worth PPV for sure nothing like a good night of boxing with good fights on. Don't be tight pay for the entertainment
