And to the people who say they fight nothing alike: They are both defensive wizards and technical masters. That is why they are in the same conversation.
what do you want me to say? boxing is a learning curve Floyd still has speed, but more importantly, he has the wisdom of experience to go with it no point dwelling on the past
Well, all I did was ask if you thought he won or lost that fight. I'm hardly dwelling on the past. And to Floyd's credit, he learned a lot in that fight and went on to do a lot better in the rematch.
Then the same dumbass' say floyd and broner fight a like. Floyd and rigo fight a like more than any other two top boxers I can think of.
I agree Rigo is even more skilled then Floyd, i'm not hating on Floyd he is a genius but honestly if Rigo was a WW he would outbox even Mayweather he is the most skilled fighter i've ever seen since watching boxing
Anytime haters get a chance to pour dirt on Floyd they relish it so it's not surprising to hear that crap being spread. I don't agree and here's why, He doesn't execute his arsenal as fluid and seamlessly as Floyd. He's a little stiff and you can see him thinking a lot of times before he delivers. You can't do that with Floyd. Floyd is more versatile and because his playbook is a lot bigger than Rigondeaux's. Rigs uses what he's got brilliantly but when he runs outa moves, Floyd will still have new ones to use.
Their styles are not even similar and I got a feeling that the thread is made to bash Floyd as usual.
Well Rigo was a two times olympic champion. This fact equate easily a 20-0 record plus let us say world champion accolate in two weight classes ... :happy. Even the great Mayweather wasn't able to take gold at the olimpics ...