Is Rigondeaux's win over Donaire better than any of Mayweather's

I'd have to say no, donaire was a solid champion and definitely a HOF'er but rigo exposed him and showed his limitations, which questions some of his previous wins as to whether he won based more on physical ability rather than boxing greatness? plus when you look at what happened after rigo beat him he went up to a division where he was the same size as the rest and got chopped and has been sliding down ever since! then take may's wins over guys like cotto, pac (faked the injury) and marquez who are all HOF'ers with a higher claim to p4p greatness than donaire ever was at the given time may fought and beat them. plus look what they still managed to do after losing to Floyd, each one of them went on to win accolades cementing there position in the HOF which is way more then donaire has achieved

 

Floyd may have cherry picked the timing of his opponents but the truth is he beats every one of them int heir prime also.

 

Hell no. Foh lmao

 

Some of these clowns are truly hilarious when they aren't capable of even remotely hiding their daily agenda, hate on fmj in every and any way possible.

They must never read their own posts and threads with a slightly opened mind before posting their idiocy

 

I don't respond to the **** posters with boxing knowledge. I just take a **** on them.

 

Yeh clearly you could make a case for donaire being p4p 2 only after mayweather, he was 3 at the time and had layed waste to multiple champions in a few weights

 

Donaire should have never been ranked as high as he was on the P4P. He was beating people he was heavily favored against but because he was KOing them people were moving him up higher on the list. Rigo just showed the world Donaire was a good fighter not great. Rigo is a great fighter.