Is RJJ higher P4P then Hagler?

Why would anyone vote hagler, because he didn't take steroids ?

 

Let's not talk about this. This makes me uncomfortable. It's a good thread but I don't want to talk about it. Let's actually just-McGrain, can you delete this thread for us, please? Like it never happened ever? We could always make it again somewhere else, but for right now, if you don't mind. I'll just step out of your way and let you take care of it. I don't want to distract you from deletion. Go ahead. Don't mind us.

 

Yeah I also don't want to think about it.

I'd rather think about Hagler on roids and the corpses he'd have left in his wake.

Wait.

Let's not go there either.

 

I think so yes RJJ has 23 world title wins compared to 13 for Hagler.

RJJ has more impressive feats P4P wise.

RJJ was the man for a decade where as Hagler was the man for 7 years.

Objectively it's RJJ for me.

 

I don't disagree with the weighting that Roy deserves his plaudits for being successful going up in weight but Hagler fought for the undisputed title and was the man at the weight - splintered belts, more politricks and the way Roy went about his business, I can't be bothered to run through each title fight but I strongly doubt that they all carry the same prestige or weighting of what Hagler's title fights carried.

 

I would say yes, without question. Hagler was a tad overrated.