Is Roman Gonzalez a better P4P fighter than Pac?

Fishing in empty waters there pal.

 

Pac was never pfp the best at any point of his career. He was always #2, and his fighter of the decade award was fraudulently given to him by guys who liked him more than Floyd. Pac was a great fighter and in my book he is an ATG, but Floyd was better no if's and's or but's! And while it sounds like disrespect, it isn't.

 

you and blizzyblizz are two of the worst posters on here

how can you compare morales, barrera and marquez the best mexican fighters of all time, to estrada and caudras who both beat roman gonzalez! they are no where even close to the quality of morales and marquez and they still beat roman! sick of this now, hbo hype has gone totally out of control

 

neither is roman gonzalez nowhere near p4p the best, it's crazy how people like you are buy into the hbo machine! you either want him to be the best because you like his style or your from Nicaragua, there's plenty of amateurs right now that would absolutely dominate him

 

Nice veiled insults to Pac there.

 

If Gonzalez can defeat Inoue to unify, and then defends against the likes Estrada and Cuadras, then the margin won't be as great as many people might think. If he accomplishes this and then moves up to win a championship at bantamweight, we can then engage in serious discussion in terms of their all time standing.

That said, Gonzalez wipes out flyweight Pac any day of the week and twice on Sunday in a fantasy match.