Is Sergey Kovalev an ATG?

You thought Cleverly would take over 175! Why should we listen to you?!:

 

You have a guy who was banned for racism, liking your post and you run in those circles you have some nerve troll. Either refute my post or go back to the lounge clown.

 

What a clown. No credibility. I've seen many people expose this Dino fellow, it's obvious nobody should consider his opinion or give him the time of day.

 

I tihnk Adonis was working towards becoming the man for sure, but it got cut tragically short.

 

Na im fine here on the general ESB. thx though.

 

These things happen when you spend half a decade milking your title against non threats.

 

Twat.

 

Racism between Froch and Kovalev? Grow up you clown and I’ve seen your woman hands on them stupid videos you downloaded, look like they like a good manicure

Anyway back to the point in question, Stevenson may have been lineal but Kovalev was the man, compare their respective resumes during their runs....it’s like Floyd was never the man at 140 when Tszyu was fighting.

As for Gvozdyk I’ve been saying since he turned pro that he was the standout in the division, hence why Ward got out after the shambles of the rematch with Kovalev.

 

Tell me more about how Golovkin fought WBA regular mandatories??
I see you're still bitter with me after i exposed you lies.

 

HOF...Sure.

ATG...Nah.

 

Youre right 140 was the only division pbf fought at where he wasnt lineal and the man.
Btw i ethered all the haters on this forum with my videos. They're classic

 

Was Ward the man at 175?

 

Charles was not the man. Losses to Tunero , Marshal and Bivens got in the way of him being the man even if he was regarded as being better than Lesnevich.

Spinks was not better than Tyson , but Tyson had to beat him to became the man. Kovalev had to beat Steveson to become the man , he never did , therefore he was not the man of the division. Facts > opinions.