Is "Seth Mitchell in 18 months" the new "arreola if he lost 30lb"?

Have you seen Arreola at 236lbs against Releford?

He looked weaker & worse than he did at 250lbs!

 

Yeah areola lost weight but put on no muscles.he was poor at 236

 

Thats because Arreola is a joke!

 

That's a bit harsh, he's a decent tough journeyman with a lot of hype, which made him into a contender.

 

This is what a shredded muscles ATG Arreola might look like, in a rematch weigh-in for Vitali II... :bbb

This content is protected

 

Mitchell will be better than Arreola, but will not beat a Klitschko.

 

Arreola is a fat joke.

Mitchell has got potential.

 

this

 

Mitchel is Black. Arreola is of mixed Indian and White heritage.

Who do you think has the advantages here.

Thats right. The guy that can fight. Arreola.

 

Mitchel is better than him

 

Mitchell looks okay, but he has a lot to learn and he's already 29. I'll keep an eye on him though.

 

Mitchell has already KOd a Blevel fighter, something Arreola has yet to do. While I don't think Mitchell is able to ever beat Vitali, he does have that punchers chance if her get inside Wlads jab and THROWS.

I see Mitchell as a faster version of Peter, without the tested chin, but with a bit more explosive punching. If his chin holds together well, and he times his title run properly, not in 18 mos as the TS suggests, but maybe 2.5-3.5 yrs, he should be able to capture a title if not unification.

Several of the hyped future challengers seem to be packing serious china. Fury, Price, Dimitrenko, Wilder, Szpilka etc, and many seem to lack defense like Glaskov and Pulev.

But HW is a deep division, and there are many guys coming on behind the scenes as well, so it's anybodies guess really, especially since Helenius seems to have hand problems worse than originally predicted.:-(

 

If Seth Mitchell has a solid chin, he beats all of those guys. :good