is the "beat me and fight my brother" only a clause for wlad klitschko?

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by Relentless, Jan 27, 2011.


  1. Relentless

    Relentless VIP Member banned

    65,864
    16
    Mar 5, 2006
    i never hear of vitklit asking for such a thing.
     
  2. c4_lineal

    c4_lineal Member Full Member

    311
    0
    May 8, 2010
    I thought you were gonna suggest that if Vlad wins, he has to fight Del boys brother (Rodney) before i clicked on the thread.

    Good question, i've never heard anything like that coming from Vitali challengers.
     
  3. BigBone

    BigBone Boxing Addict Full Member

    6,465
    1,730
    Nov 20, 2007
    I liked your other alias better. Which was it, Dollar Bill or Pound *****?
     
  4. c4_lineal

    c4_lineal Member Full Member

    311
    0
    May 8, 2010
    I don't know who your talking too but if it was up to me, i'd rather Pound *****!
     
  5. Robney

    Robney ᴻᴼ ᴸᴼᴻᴳᴲᴿ ᴲ۷ᴵᴸ Full Member

    93,213
    27,921
    Jan 18, 2010
    No it also counts for some Vitali opponents.

    It looks strange, but how many brothers dominated a whole division. And with different attributes.
    If someone is able to beat one (say someone lucky punches Wlad), Vitali can easyly become the undisputed champion.
    And if someone finds a way to outpoint Vitali, Wlad can knock this guy senseless to become undisputed himself.
     
  6. sadlittleboy

    sadlittleboy Boxing Junkie Full Member

    8,792
    0
    Mar 12, 2009
    It doesn't really matter...no one beats them out of the active heavies anyway
     
  7. Relentless

    Relentless VIP Member banned

    65,864
    16
    Mar 5, 2006
    then why put in such stupid clauses?
     
  8. Boxing Fanatic

    Boxing Fanatic Loyal Member banned

    48,204
    9
    Sep 16, 2008
    I wonder how many clauses Haye has? The dude has got an excuse for everything
     
  9. sadlittleboy

    sadlittleboy Boxing Junkie Full Member

    8,792
    0
    Mar 12, 2009
    It's no stupider than "options" that most promoters put into contracts.
     
  10. JoeLaTurkey

    JoeLaTurkey Active Member Full Member

    1,078
    4
    May 20, 2010
    I heard a few Mayweather vs. Matthew Hatton rumours a coupla years ago.
     
  11. Robney

    Robney ᴻᴼ ᴸᴼᴻᴳᴲᴿ ᴲ۷ᴵᴸ Full Member

    93,213
    27,921
    Jan 18, 2010
    Have you followed the HW (or any) division of late? If someone finds a way to beat one, he would sacrifice his first born if neccesairy to avoid the other brother.
     
  12. Primenal

    Primenal Boxing Addict Full Member

    4,266
    6
    Feb 10, 2008
    It isn't like there both not beltholders and draw the most $. ****, if I beat one brother and took a belt or two while making the most $ in my life...I'd sure as hell fight the other brother, win another belt or two, and make EVEN MORE $ than I did for beating the other brother!!!
    These are the 2 best in the division (obviously). Your improving your legacy, improving your wallet, perhaps unifying the belts. SO, if that's defines as a "Slave" contract then I'm dumbfounded.
    Most guys don't want to fight anybody (such as David Haye) for fear of losing especially title holders. These guys are actually putting there brother (whom is a title holder) in there own contract, and your guaranteed a fight with the other champ if you get past the 1st!!!
     
  13. Overhill

    Overhill Boxing Addict Full Member

    6,960
    5
    Jul 28, 2010
    They're not cool but certainly they are not stupid either. Quite the opposite.
     
  14. BewareofDawg

    BewareofDawg P4P Champ Full Member

    27,677
    184
    Apr 8, 2006
    Because they can
     
  15. Relentless

    Relentless VIP Member banned

    65,864
    16
    Mar 5, 2006
    yes it is

    the clause is lsoe to me then you will fight my big brother, beat him and then you'll fight me again.

    thats a don king contract if i ever saw one.