Is the current Heavyweight Division that bad?

Discussion in 'Classic Boxing Forum' started by GPater11093, Jan 10, 2010.


  1. Duodenum

    Duodenum Boxing Junkie Full Member

    11,623
    322
    Apr 18, 2007
    My mother used to smoke. One day, she was sitting at the table with her morning coffee and cigarette, doing her crossward puzzle, and I snuck up from behind to pester her. Without looking, she reached back and stubbed it out -- right between my eyes.
     
  2. RockyJim

    RockyJim Boxing Addict Full Member

    5,249
    2,446
    Mar 26, 2005
    You're kidding,......right?
     
  3. Stonehands89

    Stonehands89 Boxing Junkie Full Member

    10,776
    317
    Dec 12, 2005
    Now I know how to identify you -that circular scar right between your eyes.











    ....my scars are all emotional.











    I'm kidding. I adore my mom.
     
  4. Polymath

    Polymath Boxing Junkie Full Member

    8,651
    4
    Sep 29, 2007
    This is a crucial point that signifies really how dismally weak the current division (and other divisions as well) is; 38 year olds are not good at boxing! Of course there are 1 in a million exceptions, but generally a proliferation of 40 yr olds in any physical sport indicates a lack of talent.
     
  5. Maxmomer

    Maxmomer Boxing Addict Full Member

    7,373
    42
    Jun 28, 2007
    I honestly think that's the No. 1 fight I'd like to see at HW right now. I like Chambers. Outside of his fight with Povetkin, anyway.
     
  6. Bummy Davis

    Bummy Davis Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    23,674
    2,172
    Aug 26, 2004
    We had Alfredo Evangelisa and Lorenzo Zanon, We also Al"blue " Lewis in the 70's Big Leroy Jones in the 80's and David Bey, the there was Jurgin Blin and Ruddi Lubbers....Seems like Brock and Davarryl may be able to compete with that group and come out on top. I hear what you say but I will be honest every era had there share
     
  7. Seamus

    Seamus Proud Kulak Full Member

    62,574
    47,812
    Feb 11, 2005
    This is absolutely untrue. Due to sports medicine athletes in all theaters are competing much longer. A 40 year old quarterback almost won MVP of the NFL this year. A 37 year old quarterback just had one of the greatest games in NFL history today. The same goes for track and field, even in the young man's game of the sprints. Hell, a few years back Troy Douglas ran a 10.1 100 meters at 39 years of age. Linford Christie competed to the ripe old age of 40 on an international level.

    More specific to boxing, take Vitali Klitschko. 30 years ago were he would have been forced into permanent retirement by back and knee injuries, probably by his 30th birthday. Today, the surgeries for such afflictions allowed him to come back and regain the title.

    The longer an athlete, and particularly a boxer, can compete in his sport and hone his craft, the higher level he will attain. Ultimately, his physical decline overtakes his improvement in technique and maturity of skills. However this moment has been significantly delayed by modern sports medicine.
     
  8. apollack

    apollack Boxing Addict Full Member

    4,250
    1,699
    Sep 13, 2006
    Yes, it really is that bad.
     
  9. Sardu

    Sardu RIP Mr. Bun: 2007-2012 Full Member

    3,581
    52
    Jan 22, 2008
    I think that Denis Boystov kid is going to be something special. He's only 23, is 27-0 with 22 KO's, and he's in tremendous shape although he is of modest size for a modern heavy.
     
  10. 8count

    8count sidekick Full Member

    1,788
    0
    Jun 5, 2009
    well if both Klits fought each other, it would boost the division. but that ain't happenin
     
  11. Polymath

    Polymath Boxing Junkie Full Member

    8,651
    4
    Sep 29, 2007
    Care to mention some of these 'sports medicine' developments? It's a myth really, not as bad as the poster who recently said Bowe would beat some old timer 'coz Bowe had all the advantages of 'modern nutrition' :lol:, but similar.

    If you look at sports where the best have to compete against the best, all the time, you generally don't get 40 yr olds doing well. Tennis players are well past there best in their early 30's; they can't play one match a year against a hand-selected opponent. If boxing champions had to face the best competition, all the time, it'd be the same. Tennis is a good comparison because, like boxing, it has a unique skillset, but its primarily a physical/reflex sport.
     
  12. lefthook31

    lefthook31 Obsessed with Boxing banned

    20,862
    138
    Jul 6, 2007
    Boxing is different, you cant compare a quarterback who has people protecting him or younger faster receivers getting open quicker to the reflexes required of one on one combat.
    If this is the case, due to sports medicine and nutrition the younger fighters should be that much faster and better as well, and they would be able to take advantage of those older guys if they had the talent. The bottom line is the division is dismal and its purely based on lack of talent and developed skills, mainly for the reason someone mentioned above. No longer are fighters brought along to be tested and experience level ups in boxing, they are just brought along with a nice cushy record and then fed to the champion for a life securing payday in the millions.
    When you have the two dominant champions with very blatant flaws in their game such as they do, that should be proof enough how far the level of fighter is beneath them.
     
  13. Jaws

    Jaws Active Member Full Member

    652
    7
    Mar 13, 2009
    Are you really comparing quarterbacks in the NFL to boxers? They couldn't be more different. Quarterbacks routinely play to that age....especially the good ones. Quarterbacking is mostly decision making, something that experience aids in. It doesn't rely nearly as much on athleticism, stamina, and reflex as boxing does. Furthermore, Favre has the best O-line and the best running back in the league around him. And if Warner is so good, then why is he going to announce his retirement when their playoff run is over?

    Anyway, I'm not saying a 38 year old can't be competitive in boxing, I'm saying they shouldn't be the dominating force. There is a distinction there.
     
  14. Seamus

    Seamus Proud Kulak Full Member

    62,574
    47,812
    Feb 11, 2005
    Who, pray tell, are the other even decent quarterbacks playing 20 years ago who were pushing 40, let alone ones who were playing at Hall of Fame levels? And Warner's performance yesterday was one of the best ever in a play-off game. And if you people think an nfl qb is protected, I suggest you go talk to some 50 year old ex-nfl qb's and give them a hand with their walkers and wheelchairs.

    OK, this isn't a football board... However, more protean to boxing, simple things like rotator cuff surgeries, various hand surgeries, knee scopes, ligament repairs have gone from being non-existent or at best cro-magnon in 70's to being outpatient routine now. These procedures prolong a fighter's peak. The most obvious example, again, is Vitaly, who would be long out of the game if it weren't for two knee surgeries and a back surgery.
     
  15. Jaws

    Jaws Active Member Full Member

    652
    7
    Mar 13, 2009
    Joe Montana, Dan Marino, and John Elway all played impressively to the age of 38 when they retired with playoff appearances, and in Elway's case, a Superbowl win. I could easily find more.

    Anyway, you are avoiding my points and making points on assumptions I never said. I never said QB's are "protected", and that has no relevance to the discussion anyway.

    Again, older athletes can effectively play the position of an NFL quarterback. It places completely different demands on an individual than sustained one-on-one, hand-to-hand combat.

    And medical technology has not changed much from the '90's to the '00's.....and even the '80's. Both eras I consider much better than '00's..