Is the Heavyweight Division getting better?

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by SmokinJoe100, Jun 4, 2015.


  1. SmokinJoe100

    SmokinJoe100 Guest

    Is the Heavyweight Division getting better than recent years? There's Anthony Joshua coming up the ranks, Wilders WBC Champ, Wladimir's still going strong as ever, and Fury in the mix too. Plus there's other's about like Povetkin.
     
  2. SmackDaBum

    SmackDaBum TKO7 banned Full Member

    5,191
    1,716
    Nov 22, 2014
  3. Jake LaMotta

    Jake LaMotta Lights Out Full Member

    7,293
    1,482
    Jan 3, 2015
    Wouldn't be too hard for it to get better tbh.
     
  4. OvidsExile

    OvidsExile At a minimum, a huckleberry over your persimmon. Full Member

    35,289
    38,079
    Aug 28, 2012
    This. Has it gone from abysmal to just ****?
     
  5. madballster

    madballster Loyal Member Full Member

    37,210
    6,765
    Jul 21, 2009
    Look back at ESB history, people always were saying "Oh look now we got interesting contenders, NOW its looking up". And then all these guys were beaten into submissions by the K brothers, losing their souls, toes, eyes, retinas, knees and lust for life.

    Brock, Solis, Pulev, Povetkin, Haye were all touted as contenders who would be able to mix it up -- and once they tasted the first punch they decided they want out instead.
     
    Boxed Ears likes this.
  6. UniversalPart

    UniversalPart Boxing Junkie banned Full Member

    14,633
    11,809
    Jul 1, 2010
    Yes. More depth. But there is a clear number one and that is Wladimir Klitschko.

    Once he retires, the titles are going to be passed around like a blunt at a rasta party and people will yearn for a clear number one again.
     
  7. Robney

    Robney ᴻᴼ ᴸᴼᴻᴳᴲᴿ ᴲ۷ᴵᴸ Full Member

    93,213
    27,920
    Jan 18, 2010
    Like Madbállster says, we've seen many ot\f these threads in the last couple of years. But when the mentioned guys failed, they were put in the bums bin afterwards.
     
  8. madballster

    madballster Loyal Member Full Member

    37,210
    6,765
    Jul 21, 2009
    Exactly. And the thing is this: IMO guys like Haye/Povetkin would have been able to win an ABC belt in the 80s or 90s or early 2000s and hold on to them for a few defenses and actually have credibility as a HW. But Wlad's dominance denigrates them to mere contenders.
     
  9. beachie17

    beachie17 Boxing Addict Full Member

    4,849
    2
    Jun 4, 2014
    Looks so, Joshua and Parker look the pick of the prospects and there are some good contenders about now but I would like to see a few more prospects coming up through the ranks though otherwise we could see another Klitschko type domination from someone.
     
  10. damian38

    damian38 BigDramaShow Full Member

    25,548
    203
    Sep 11, 2011
    more competetive, for sure, but better? how many HW's on Wlad's level do you see on the horizon?
     
  11. Rico Spadafora

    Rico Spadafora Master of Chins Full Member

    45,385
    3,797
    Feb 20, 2008

    I would favor Parker to knock out Joshua right now.
     
  12. STB

    STB #noexcuses Full Member

    15,486
    41
    Mar 26, 2014
    Yes.

    It couldnt have gotten any worse than what it was about 2-3 years ago though
     
  13. dinovelvet

    dinovelvet Antifanboi Full Member

    61,311
    24,024
    Jul 21, 2012
    None. Thats why its getting better.

    2004-2012 was the worst HW Era known to man.

    So bad that many guys from low down as far as Middle weight moved there to have success and pick up titles.
     
  14. beachie17

    beachie17 Boxing Addict Full Member

    4,849
    2
    Jun 4, 2014
    I certainly wouldn't but it doesn't really matter and it wasn't my point, in years time you are likely to see a domination again from one of these guys or Fury or Wilder, if there aren't any more top prospects coming through.
     
  15. JAB5239

    JAB5239 Boxing Junkie Full Member

    14,470
    58
    Feb 23, 2008
    I agree with this. It may become more competetive, but the talent still lacks until proven otherwise.