Is the Magnificent 7 PPV worthy?

The only reason why you think the card was PPV worthy was because of Macklin-Barker. Is that because Macklin has Irish in him? And you give him stick over Khan

 

What has Macklin being Irish got to do with anything? :huh It's the fight most people want to see and imo it is the fight that made this card ppv worthy, regardless of the nationality of the fighters.

 

You think Khan - Salita was ppv worthy and I'm the idiot?

 

How is a card that has five main event worthy fights on it not PPV worthy?

Cleverly-Murat
Maccinerelli-Frenkel
Chisora-Sexton
Brooks-Jennings
Rhodes-Konecy

All of those are well-matched, potentially very good fights, plus the Olympians as well, how is that not PPV worthy?

 

You think Macklin-Barker is PPV worthy? .

Khan-Salita
Mitchell-Prescott
Simpson-Bell
Saunders-Noble
Gavin-Tergaiou
DeGale-King

Over Mack-Barker? :rofl

 

Exactly.

Clev-Murat is a 50/50 fight.
Mac-Frenkel is 50/50
Chis/Sexton another 50/50 imo
Brook/Jennings another quality fight which could be a war.

Don't know about the last but that's quality to me.

 

Cleverly-Murat
Maccinerelli-Frenkel
Chisora-Sexton
Brooks-Jennings
Rhodes-Konecy

all five would or could have been FFN'S last year so to have all five on one night along with the olympians is worth £15 in anyones world surely

 

Not in loughlan's.

 

Brook V Jennings is the only other fight that interests me greatly out of that list and the way things are going that may also go tits up. Do you want me to lie and say that I will be paying the ppv for this line up? I will if that makes you feel better :roll: PPV should be reserved for the big fights, not just a few average fights lumped together.

 

Forget the undercard, was Khan - Salita alone more ppv worthy than Macklin - Barker?

 

It definitely takes the sheen off it, it's probably still worth it, but if it loses another big fight it could be looking shaky. Those fights down the bill that weren't as competitive get pushed up the running order and start to look a bit weak.

Also, the Khan/Salita PPV was a ****in joke. As was Khan/Prescott if we're going there.

 

Voted no. If they were guaranteed to all be shown live and in full then I'd have said yes, but what will probably happen is that what we'll see actually live is the Rhodes fight, Brook v Jennings, Clev v Murat, and Macklin v whoever they pull out of their arse on short notice, all interspersed with highlights and tape delays of the rest if they've got time between the adverts and "up next, comments from Johnny and Glenn" ****ery.

 

No. Macklin-Barker is more of a quality fight with action. I always knew Khan-Salita was going to be a blowover.

I wouldn't buy Khan-Salita if it was PPV alone. Who the hell would do that? Well you'd obviously do it just for Macklin-Barker.

 

I voted no, but on reflection it probably is worthy of PPV provided no further fights fall through.