Is the P4P title directly transferable? Pac vs Hatton

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by Taylex, Feb 1, 2009.


Page 1 of 3
  1. Taylex

    Taylex Boxing Addict Full Member

    6,885
    1
    Oct 15, 2007
    I heard Hatton saying he is fighting for the P4P title so I just wondered if anyone agreed with the idea that the P4P title directly transferable?

    It would be better than fighting for the IBO title which no one really has any respect for.
     
    Taylex, Feb 1, 2009
    Taylex, Feb 1, 2009
    #1
  2. bladerunner

    bladerunner El Intocable Full Member

    33,921
    133
    Jul 20, 2004
    no its not it wasnt when Jones lost to Tarver and when Mosley lost to Forrest,and it isnt this time.
     
    bladerunner, Feb 1, 2009
    bladerunner, Feb 1, 2009
    #2
  3. Mike_S

    Mike_S Well-Known Member Full Member

    2,029
    171
    Nov 4, 2007
    I've got a bad feeling they are going to announce this fight as "for the pound for pound title" or we will at least be hearing it more from people other than Hatton in the build up to this fight. De La Hoya has already started saying it.
     
    Mike_S, Feb 1, 2009
    Mike_S, Feb 1, 2009
    #3
  4. warrior85

    warrior85 R.I.P THUNDER Full Member

    11,865
    3
    May 30, 2007
    if he absolutely destroys pac im talkin a dominating performance ending in a ko then he'd have a hell of an arguement for bein p4p no.1
     
    warrior85, Feb 1, 2009
    warrior85, Feb 1, 2009
    #4
  5. Larryboys

    Larryboys Well-Known Member Full Member

    2,648
    2
    Sep 6, 2008
    What's this, the millionth time now?
     
    Larryboys, Feb 1, 2009
    Larryboys, Feb 1, 2009
    #5
  6. ishy

    ishy Loyal Member Full Member

    44,755
    7
    Mar 9, 2008
    It always pisses me off when Hatton says he's fighting for the P4P title. It's not lineal for ****s sake!!!

    Forger the IBO they're fighting for THE linear/Ring Light-Welterweight Title.
     
    ishy, Feb 1, 2009
    ishy, Feb 1, 2009
    #6
  7. Taylex

    Taylex Boxing Addict Full Member

    6,885
    1
    Oct 15, 2007
    If you are sick of talking about the Pac vs Hatton fight then just stay away from the discussion.
     
    Taylex, Feb 1, 2009
    Taylex, Feb 1, 2009
    #7
  8. Taylex

    Taylex Boxing Addict Full Member

    6,885
    1
    Oct 15, 2007
    What position in the p4p rankings would Hatton have to be to make this a fight for the p4p title?
     
    Taylex, Feb 1, 2009
    Taylex, Feb 1, 2009
    #8
  9. Mike_S

    Mike_S Well-Known Member Full Member

    2,029
    171
    Nov 4, 2007
    There is no pound for pound title? Well there shouldn't be, everyone can make their own minds up on who is pound for pound number 1 if they like.
     
    Mike_S, Feb 1, 2009
    Mike_S, Feb 1, 2009
    #9
  10. ishy

    ishy Loyal Member Full Member

    44,755
    7
    Mar 9, 2008
    2nd or 3rd I'd say. If Pac were fighting JMM that would be for the p4p title IMO.
     
    ishy, Feb 1, 2009
    ishy, Feb 1, 2009
    #10
  11. Mike_S

    Mike_S Well-Known Member Full Member

    2,029
    171
    Nov 4, 2007
    What if there is a dodgy decision, a DQ or if you consider this not to be Pac's best weight class? I hope no one has seriously said yes, what a joke.
     
    Mike_S, Feb 1, 2009
    Mike_S, Feb 1, 2009
    #11
  12. ishy

    ishy Loyal Member Full Member

    44,755
    7
    Mar 9, 2008
    True, there are a few factors to consider. Manner of victory etc. would count for a lot.
     
    ishy, Feb 1, 2009
    ishy, Feb 1, 2009
    #12
  13. Taylex

    Taylex Boxing Addict Full Member

    6,885
    1
    Oct 15, 2007
    Agreed
     
    Taylex, Feb 1, 2009
    Taylex, Feb 1, 2009
    #13
  14. Mike_S

    Mike_S Well-Known Member Full Member

    2,029
    171
    Nov 4, 2007
    :patsch
     
    Mike_S, Feb 1, 2009
    Mike_S, Feb 1, 2009
    #14
  15. Taylex

    Taylex Boxing Addict Full Member

    6,885
    1
    Oct 15, 2007
    Why?
     
    Taylex, Feb 1, 2009
    Taylex, Feb 1, 2009
    #15
Page 1 of 3