Some of my favourite fighters are Mexican. Just find it amusing that you choose criteria that makes Mexico the best boxing nation p4p.
That's the same criteria I've always used. Even when other nations had more champs and top contenders. The fact that Mexico benefits from this right now, is only a testament to a great period in our boxing history.
I'm sorry, but you really are a ******, there's no other way to put it. I'm done here, because you're making me slowly lose faith in humanity...
OK, you're right. The land mass and population of a country has everything to do with how good it is P4P, instead of it's current actual boxing champions and top contenders. You win, congratulations.
Who said anything about mass? It's funny you mock me for failing to grasp concepts when it appears you're missing my point completely. The reason we use the term P4P in describing boxers because it takes weight into consideration. Floyd is a better boxer than Wlad P4P but obviously he wouldn't beat him in a fight. Now what could be the equivalent of what P4P is when discussing a nation's prowess other than its population. Otherwise, why bother use the term P4P? The term serves no purpose in the context of boxing nations, the question would simply be, "Is the UK the best boxing nation?"
Well he obviously means P4P in terms of its fighters, y'know, because that actually has something to do with boxing. He's taking into consideration the amount of highly ranked fighters that it currently has and using them in a statistic to determine the best nation "P4P", as opposed to just it's general population, which is irrelevant and has nothing to with boxing at all. Why the hell you even brought that up I don't know, nice red herring though.