Both fighters wouldn`t let go their shots enough because they feared the speed and power of counters and both were easily out-jabbed, except Broner landed more jabs than Eubank did v Groves, are their any other comparisons here? Both fighters were delusional after their losses also.
There are more differences between them than similarities. The main ones being, Eubank is too delusional to see his flaws. Broner is too dumb to see his. Eubank has a true will to win and will usually lay it on the line. Broner doesn't. He talks the talk, but flat out refuses to walk the walk and go for broke when he is clearly losing. As for similarities, outside of the ring they are both entertaining in a car crash kind of a way. **** it! Put them in the ring together. Will Eubank's size and delusions of grandeur sweep him to victory, or will Broner miraculously and unwittingly low IQ his way to glory?