Is there a rehydration clause for the Margarito fight?

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by saul_ir34, Oct 13, 2010.


  1. Real_Truth

    Real_Truth Guest

    Think about what you are ****ing saying dumbass...you just pointed it out. A rehydration clause would be impossible to uphold as it would be very questionable if Pac pulls out of the fight on fight night for some unknown reason. And what is Pac supposed to do? Have Roach or someone from his team weigh Margarito or any other opponent before going to the ring? You ****ing *****s are pathetic. I hope you will be one of the many who commits suicide when Pac beats the **** out of Mayweather, should Mayweather ever find the courage to face Pac.
     
  2. titan

    titan Active Member Full Member

    954
    0
    Sep 16, 2010
    :rofl:rofl. ellerbe and void on a vacation. some mean man love between that two. :rofl
     
  3. whoupicking?

    whoupicking? Boxing Junkie Full Member

    8,378
    2
    Mar 4, 2010
    Pac could easily get margo to weigh himself come fight night. They don't even have to show it on HBO. This can be kept between top rank.

    Margo shud be able to rehydrate to whatever he wants but he wont be allowed to, Im sick of this ****.:rofl
     
  4. Karceno

    Karceno Guest

    i have been saying this for a year now and Vivek will back me up on this
     
  5. shaunster101

    shaunster101 Yido Full Member

    24,013
    16
    Nov 29, 2007
    Do you actually have any evidence? I mean one piece of evidence that there are rehydration clauses in these contracts.

    All people want is some evidence. Is that too much to ask?
     
  6. shaunster101

    shaunster101 Yido Full Member

    24,013
    16
    Nov 29, 2007
    I'll take that as a 'no' then
     
  7. Devildoc

    Devildoc Capo Di Tutti Capi Full Member

    11,804
    2
    May 18, 2009
    *****s can't produce proof with all the accusations they've been throwing in the air. Kinda like how Pac is on roids.
     
  8. timmyjames

    timmyjames PTurd curb stomper Full Member

    12,816
    1
    Nov 14, 2009
    actually the two are quite different


    while pacs refusal to take randomized testing makes him look awfully suspicious, we will never know or be able to have evidence of his potential PED usage, since they proof is/was in his blood


    as far as a dehydration clause, which i don't believe exists, but if it does, it would be on paper somewhere, and proof would literally be in black and white, thus easier to come by if somehow leaked


    the fact that there actually hasn't been anything leaked (on paper) makes it that much less believable, imo
     
  9. shaunster101

    shaunster101 Yido Full Member

    24,013
    16
    Nov 29, 2007
    :good
     
  10. Devildoc

    Devildoc Capo Di Tutti Capi Full Member

    11,804
    2
    May 18, 2009
    As far as that stupid Rehydration clause, Vivek hasn't come up with proof that it exist. Probably just pulled it out of his ass because he had nothing great to write about Floyd.

    It's not a matter of Pacquiao not agreeing to drug testing. It's the fact that it was another boxer who requested it be done which is not considered normal in the sport. Pac did agree to give urine whenever they want and according to more reliable posters here who actually works in the field, Urine is better to detect whatever drug mayweather is accusing Pac of using. Remember it's still a negotiation. Floyd wanted 60% of the purse, Pac wanted 50%. Floyd wanted full drug testing, Pac says cuttoff date but with full urine sample whenever they want it. The whole Drug testing is a joke anyway because people do get caught whenever they use anything illegal. Another reason why it's a joke is that since Mayweather accused Pacquiao of using peds and Mayweather said he wants to clean the sport, how many fighters has gone through random blood testing? Floyd and Mosley and that's because both fought and Mosley has no choice to do what Floyd wanted in order to make the fight happen.

    Pacquiao has agreed to full drug testing that mayweather wanted ( though we don't know to what extent, assuming no cutoff date ) Floyd decided he didn't want the fight.
     
  11. timmyjames

    timmyjames PTurd curb stomper Full Member

    12,816
    1
    Nov 14, 2009
    no spin

    in the era of PEDs he refused....its suspicious

    but that isnt the point...the point is, since he wont/wouldnt take them, we will never know

    as far as the topic title, there would be proof in writing/typed, and there is nothing leaked supporting this
     
  12. Devildoc

    Devildoc Capo Di Tutti Capi Full Member

    11,804
    2
    May 18, 2009
    Pacquiao didn't refuse. Pac negotiated to have a cutoff date and random urine testing up to the night of the fight. Pac won't jump whenever Floyd says jump. That's mosley.

    That's my final say in that topic Timmy but yeah I agree with you to an extent. Good to know not all Floyd fans are idiots.
     
  13. kartog

    kartog Agent Smith Full Member

    3,975
    84
    Sep 8, 2006
    There is no proof once again of rehydration clauses for Pacquiao's fights.

    What we have solid proof of, however, is the lil ****er Floyd refusing to divulge the contracted weight limit in his fight with Marquez. :lol:

    And then, shamelessly dishonoring the same by coming in 2lbs over the "secret" weight limit. :rofl

    The morons who spout Roger's imbecilic rants seem unable to reach the intellectual levels needed to comprehend this. :!: :lol: :rofl
     
  14. dodong

    dodong >>PACQUIAO Full Member

    28,160
    32
    Apr 14, 2007
    .... and to continue, check out this link http://sports.espn.go.com/sports/boxing/news/story?id=2113721

    Floyd is the one that has actually asked for a rehydration limit clause for a fight in the past.
     
  15. pejevan

    pejevan inmate No. 1363917 Full Member

    18,163
    2
    May 24, 2006
    Oh no!!!

    Are you saying that it is actually Fraud who has evidence of REHYDRATION CLAUSE?

    This is too much..... The *****s might commit mass murder. Never divulge your address on ESB.

    Of course they can always question the credibility of the writer. Afterall he does not seem as credible as Roger.