Is there any era in heavyweight history that Tyson Fury wouldn't dominate

to be fair, though hes shown no evidence that he can even contend for the world title yet, hes still in his twenties, so things might change.

but I'm not holding my breath.

 

^^^This^^^

 

People love to diss this era but it's defo better than the post Ali 80's. The Holmes and Tyson eras were weaker than today. Fury would beat most of the challengers they faced, and the British domestic scene is defo stronger now than in the 80's when the only fighter was Bruno. We've got several top level guys in Britain, plus a champion in Haye who might come back. Fury is a work in progress, still uneaten, give him a break.

 

the only british fighter wasn't Bruno though was it?

its "only Bruno" to people who weren't around into boxing at the time .

 

Are you serious or just trolling?

 

You obviously never saw Shavers fight.

I didn't mention either K brother btw in my post. I just figured that was a given he'd get destroyed by both brothers. Vitali in his heyday would've knocked him out cold. Wladimir I think would stop him by the mid rounds, but he could easily just outbox him from a distance.

I don't think I'm overating any of the great HW's that I mentioned at all. i think you're SEVERELY overrating an unproven HW who has done nothing up to this point aside from 2 wins over another nobody in Chisora and also beating a former long time CW in Cunningham who has been past his prime now for at least 5 years, who also put Fury on his backside in their match.

ANyway, the good thing is that Fury will eventually take on Wladimir, so at least you'll get the chance to see him in one of these hypothetical matchups. I'll be impressed with Tyson if he can go the distance with Wladimir.

 

Gary freaking mason was rip furys head off.

 

Wlad would knock Fury out.