Is there any fighters in history under 200 pounds that you believe could beat Lewis, Klitschko etc

Discussion in 'Classic Boxing Forum' started by Moggy94, Apr 8, 2021.



  1. Moggy94

    Moggy94 Active Member Full Member

    1,068
    1,093
    Mar 25, 2021
    Depends Holyfield at 215 will be more braver coming forward at Lewis than at just under 200 and would be more confident in taking punches at 215. Also at under 200 pounds clinching with Lewis would be worse, everyone has talked about how strong Lewis was and how even just bumping into him hurt. Look at how Wladimir Klitschko was so effective in the clinch and the way he would lean on people, he would end up leaning in people to the point where they would end up on the floor. The clinch is very important in the heavyweight division especially.
     
  2. janitor

    janitor VIP Member Full Member

    70,037
    24,041
    Feb 15, 2006
    That is not an unreasonable position, but superheavyweights always had skills, and there was always a lot of effort to develop them.

    If Primo Carnera's handlers could have got Floyd Mayweather in to train him, they would have done so!
     
  3. janitor

    janitor VIP Member Full Member

    70,037
    24,041
    Feb 15, 2006
    Being 15lbs heavier will make him stronger, but it won't improve his ability to take a punch.

    Holyfield's obvious advantages are speed and technique, and he wouldn't need to sacrifice those at 199.
     
  4. Moggy94

    Moggy94 Active Member Full Member

    1,068
    1,093
    Mar 25, 2021
    But wouldn't you say there's a big difference between the modern super heavyweights and super heavyweights of the past like an Abe Simon or a Primo Canera? For example Buddy Baer had no concept of using reach in his fights against Joe Louis and neither did Simon.
     
  5. Moggy94

    Moggy94 Active Member Full Member

    1,068
    1,093
    Mar 25, 2021

    Weight can improve your ability to take a punch to a certain extent I think even Foreman said something along the lines of the extra weight helped him take punches better compared to when he was 220ish in the 70's but it's not just the you have to factor in there's the mental part that being heavier like Holyfield at 215 will give him more confidence when trading than being lighter. Also what do you think about the clinching aspect?
     
  6. janitor

    janitor VIP Member Full Member

    70,037
    24,041
    Feb 15, 2006
    Yes and no.

    You have modern guys like Bowe, who chose to scrap on the inside, with smaller fighters.

    All of these fighters tried to work out what was best for them.

    Some got it right, and some didn't.

    Against Louis, you have two options as the bigger man.

    Run from him or fight him?
     
    Jackomano likes this.
  7. Moggy94

    Moggy94 Active Member Full Member

    1,068
    1,093
    Mar 25, 2021

    True Bowe was able to fight effectively on the inside, problem is Howe's prime only consisted of one fight where he had a 25-30 pound weight advantage, fought barely any punchers and got two terrible beatings when he fought someone his own size which led to him having to retire before the age of 30, I could definitely see Louis knocking out Bowe.
     
  8. choklab

    choklab cocoon of horror Full Member

    27,511
    7,386
    Dec 31, 2009
    Those guys lacked all of the modern physical advances. Legal and otherwise.
     
  9. Boxing GOAT

    Boxing GOAT Active Member Full Member

    598
    873
    Apr 2, 2020
    Hose tactics were quite common among most fighters of that era. I’d say Dempsey was just giving what he was getting, but giving it harder. If you watch his highlight reel that demonstrates his defensive skills he looks a lot like Sweet Pea Whitaker. Highly underrated defense and a vicious puncher and finisher.
     
    Surrix likes this.
  10. Jackomano

    Jackomano Boxing Junkie Full Member

    7,840
    6,256
    Nov 22, 2014
    This. Louis was way too good at parrying and countering for a big guy to just sit back and jab him all night without paying for it. Not to mention Joe’s incredible handspeed and combinations, which were kryptonite for the big men, who were also bigger targets. Lennox Lewis or Wlad would get countered and put on their backs just the same if they over relied on their reach and jab against Louis.

    The few times Buddy just powered through and let his hands go he did damage on Louis, but the jab was ineffective, since Louis was excellent at neutralizing the jab against bigger slower heavyweights.
     
    Last edited: Apr 10, 2021
    janitor likes this.
  11. slash

    slash Boxing Addict Full Member

    5,153
    1,464
    Apr 15, 2012
    and the MENTALITY
     
  12. UltimateDestroyer

    UltimateDestroyer Member Full Member

    362
    256
    Nov 25, 2020
    Tyson, Ali, Louis, Holyfield, and other true greats would be favoured more often than not.
    Height, reach, weight, only matters up to a certain point, and depending on styles.
    We've all seen Ruiz destroy Joshua, it's not 'a different division'.

    There's less skill in the heavyweight division and in boxing in general now.
    It makes sense that the bigger guys are going to rise to the top when boxing has become about being big and tall rather than crafty and skilled.
     
    Jackomano and thistle like this.
  13. thistle

    thistle Boxing Addict Full Member

    5,644
    5,723
    Dec 21, 2016
    I agree totally, but 'Some' of the More Skilled Giants will alway have the advantage of Height, Reach... the disparity too great.

    because - it IS a whole Different Division.
     
  14. UltimateDestroyer

    UltimateDestroyer Member Full Member

    362
    256
    Nov 25, 2020
    There are other things you need to be great. Speed is so important.
    Fury can move for a giant, but he can't move like Ali.
    Ruiz beat Joshua with speed.
    Joshua is regarded as a top 2 or best heavy in the world, he shouldn't be losing to Ruiz if the big and tall argument was so simple.
    I agree size and reach can be helpful, but it isn't everything.

    Joshua was beaten by Ruiz, I'm confident plenty of other smaller, non obese blokes can beat him in a similar fashion.

    I'd confidently pick all of those I mentioned plus plenty of others to smash Wilder. Ruiz as well probably.

    Fury is probably the best now, but he's beaten a 40 year old Wlad, and... Wilder.

    Hardly much of a case for this so called new division?
    We can go back to Wlad and Vitali, who weren't as good as Lewis, who wasn't as good as Ali.

    You need speed, chin, heart, experience and punching power to be a great heavyweight, all are more important than height and weight.
     
  15. Moggy94

    Moggy94 Active Member Full Member

    1,068
    1,093
    Mar 25, 2021
    The thing is you say you're confident other men could beat Joshua how Ruiz could but who? I believe guys like Tyson, Lewis, Foreman and Holyfield could but a guy that's like 190? Hell no a 190 pound man is not standing and trading with Joshua like Ruiz did, yes Ruiz is very fat but he isn't the average fat dude, the average fat dude ain't that fast or taking punches like that. Ruiz is just one bad Mexican and Joshua got drawn into the wrong kind of fight.

    You said you need speed, chin, experience, heart and punching power to be a great heavyweight and that's absolutely right, but when you have all that AND size/strength don't you think that would help?

    It seems to be accepted that a 180 pound man could beat a 240-250 pound man in a boxing match, so what about a 118 pound boxer that is a bantamweight against a 175 pound boxer that's a Light Heavyweight, who wins?