On the other hand, we could ask why wasn't Floyd prepared to fight the same version of Pacquiao that Cotto, DeLaHoya and Hatton faced ?
I don't understand? He was.. he wanted a simple drug test which shows both people are on a level playing field win or lose.. :S
Well despite what all these other clowns say, for Pretty Boy to be brought into a Sugar Ray Leonard\Robinson conversation he absolutely has to win a undisputed middle crown. End of Story. Not fighting and beating Pacman hurts him in this discussion also.
Boxing is like no other sport. Swimming records will be broken. Sprinting records will be broken. Sports science, nutrition and training equipment etc, all play a huge part. But just because Usain Bolt is the fastest man to ever live, it doesn't mean that today's fighters are better than their predecessors as a whole, and that skills have improved. A fighter has to master a whole range of skills and techniques such as: Jabbing Hooking Slipping Throwing body punches Throwing uppercuts Timing In fighting Etc. I believe that body punching, and in fighting aren't as common as what they once were. I did a thread earlier this year titled - Have boxing skills progressed, or have they regressed? I'll bump it, if you're interested. Some weight classes were weaker in the past, and some were stronger. Nobody can say that boxers have improved as a whole over their predecessors, otherwise that would mean that today's boxers were the best ever. If fighters got better every decade, then today's guys would be the greatest of all time across each weight class. But that is clearly not the case. Who do you think would win these fights below?: At LW Duran vs Gamboa/Burns/Vazquez Armsrtrong vs Gamboa/Burns/Vazquez Pernell Whitaker vs Gamboa/Burns/Vazquez Benny Leonard vs Gamboa/Burns/Vazquez At LWW Aaron Pryor vs Peterson/Garcia/Khan/Matthysse Cervantes vs Peterson/Garcia/Khan/Matthysse Chavez Jr vs Peterson/Garcia/Khan/Matthysse Benitez vs Peterson/Garcia/Khan/Matthysse At WW Armstrong vs Floyd/Bradley/Alexander/Pac/JMM SRR vs Floyd/Bradley/Alexander/Pac/JMM SRL vs Floyd/Bradley/Alexander/Pac/JMM At LMW McCallum vs Canelo/Trout/Lara Hearns vs Canelo/Trout/Lara Norris vs Canelo/Trout/Lara De La Hoya vs Canelo/Trout/Lara Trinidad vs Canelo/Trout/Lara At MW Hopkins vs GGG/Martinez/Quillin/Sturm/Murray/Barker Ketchell vs GGG/Martinez/Quillin/Sturm/Murray/Barker Monzon vs GGG/Martinez/Quillin/Sturm/Murray/Barker Greb vs GGG/Martinez/Quillin/Sturm/Murray/Barker SRR vs GGG/Martinez/Quillin/Sturm/Murray/Barker Hagler vs GGG/Martinez/Quillin/Sturm/Murray/Barker At LHW Foster vs Stevenson/Bute/Kovalev Spinks vs Stevenson/Bute/Kovalev Tunney vs Stevenson/Bute/Kovalev Moore vs Stevenson/Bute/Kovalev Charles vs Stevenson/Bute/Kovalev RJJ vs Stevenson/Bute/Kovalev At HW Lewis vs Wlad/Vitali/Fury/Haye/Povetkin Frazier vs Wlad/Vitali/Fury/Haye/Povetkin Foreman vs Wlad/Vitali/Fury/Haye/Povetkin Holmes vs Wlad/Vitali/Fury/Haye/Povetkin Ali vs Wlad/Vitali/Fury/Haye/Povetkin Tyson vs Wlad/Vitali/Fury/Haye/Povetkin Holyfield vs Wlad/Vitali/Fury/Haye/Povetkin Louis vs Wlad/Vitali/Fury/Haye/Povetkin
Seriously stop with the Floyd hate the man is easily a top 25 fighter, undefeated 44- 0, champion at 5 weights, beaten, Corrales, Cotto, Mosley, Hernandez, JMM, ODLH. Not only has he beaten these guys he has totally and utterly dominated them, in terms to skill set he is a top ten all time, i agree however he isnt top 10, i would have him around number 15. Seriously people need to stop with the hate and understand how good floyd is, No he wont ever be the GOAT but i think he could be top 10, beat Canelo, Pacman, Bradley, GGG, Martinez and he will be in my top 10
I respect your opinion. When you say that you think that the skill level of previous generations isn't comparable today, do you mean as a whole? I'd like to hear more. See post 114.
He didn't dominate Castillo or Oscar, and do you seriously think he'd fight Golovkin or anyone at 160?
True he didnt dominate Castillo but i had him winning fairly wide vs Oscar, its just people are asking to much of the guy before giving him credit, He is a champion at 5 weights not like he has never moved up and fought bigger guys,Pep is a top 10 fighter but only a champion at 1 weight, same with Jimmy Wilde ect to suggest that Floyd needs to fight guys at 160 or 168 to be at top 25 fighter or top 10 is unfair
It wasn't as simple as that Danny. Manny wasn't asked to do anything. Big Floyd labelled him as a dirty cheat, without an ounce of proof, and then Floyd issued testing demands, up to the day of the fight. Manny's name was dragged through the mud, and in the end he sued for defamation of character. Manny agreed to be randomly blood and urine tested, but not up to the day of the fight. Floyd at that point should have let Manny have the cut off days that he required, which included random urine tests at any point, and a blood and urine test directly after the fight. But Floyd wouldn't meet Manny half way. Everything had to be Floyd's terms. So Manny never refused the tests. He refused the cut off days. There was no reason for Floyd not to allow him the cut off days. JMM has fought Manny four times without any issue, as well as a host of other fighters. In the end, Manny agreed to EVERYTHING, and 45% of the purse. But instead of Floyd being happy, and trying to make the fight, he wanted to to keep the entire PPV revenue from a fight that had realistic expectations of grossing between $200-300m. It was a joke, and it showed me that he was never serious about making the fight.
There is nothing he can do (realistically) to secure GOAT status or even become 'part of that conversation' as you term it. There are several barriers to him achieving that status. 1) He probably does not have the greatest skillset of all time. (Though he's probably somewhere in the top 10 skillwise.) 2) He hasn't fought enough. With eight fights in the past seven years, he simply has not been busy enough. And some of those fights have been against less than first class opposition. If he's fighting three or four times a year, then a Guerrero or a little JMM or an Ortiz might be justifiable as a keep-busy effort, but at the rate of one-per-year, if he were chasing GOAT status, every fight would need to be a major marquee event. 3) He ducked the one guy who might have beaten him when it mattered. He deprived the boxing fan public of a bout that would have been on a level with SRL-Hearns and FOTC. You can argue all day (and many do) that the blame falls equally on Pac and/or Arum etc, but the overwhelming majority of name boxers and others in the sport place most of the blame for this on Floyd, either for reasons of fear of losing his zero, or misjudged negotiating tactics or whatever. This kind of thing doesn't bode well for surpassing Robinson, Greb, Langford, Ali, Duran etc, guys who took on all comers. The sad part of that (from Floyd's POV) is that he would probably have won the fight. 4) Floyd is explicit in stating that $$$$$ feature more in his thinking than legacy. That is a legit position to take, but it does interfere with any pursuit of GOAT status. If he beats Canelo and finishes out his Showtime, contract with reasonably decent opposition (and wins !), he will probably, in time, crack the top 25, maybe 20. If he were to add GGG and Sergio to his resume and make one or two decent defences at 160, then he would be knocking on the door of the top ten or twelve. While I don't believe GOAT was ever in the cards for Floyd, I think he could have finished considerably higher had he made some different choices.
:rofl Calzaghe ? Why not shore it up some and add Lennox (no catchweight) ? Or remove all doubt, and take away Marciano's zero.
I agree entirely. You simply can't compare boxers with athletes from other sports. Usain Bolt's sprinting from A to B against a clock. He's not trying to time somebody who's trying to take his head off.