Is this the main reason we dislike the Klitschkos?

no doubt. its used by newbs who know jack **** about boxing. much like the ones who talk glass jaws and ppv numbers

 

Excellent post. :thumbsup


I give Klit fans a lot of **** sometimes, but I have nothing but respect for the fighters themselves, for the same reasons you state. But I'm sorry... I'm not interested in seeing them fight someone who is willing to get jabbed to death and ultimately KO'd in the name of "going out on his shield."

 

[ame]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=[/ame] [yt]uh1im3eNhro[/yt]

 

The only reason why i dislike them is the style of the 2 Klits yea Vitali is better imo but they are just boringgggg

 

I thought your point was that it was great to see two guys in the ring who were BOTH comfortable at heavyweight.

 

We here in Britain despise the brothers because the USSR grew them in test tubes as super soldiers.
We here in the U.K feared being left behind, so we attempted to grow our own BETA version, unfortunatley Thatcher went to war in the Fauklands and cut scientific funding, so we ended up with Audley Harrison instead.

 

:rofl

 

Marco huck vs Alexander povetkin was quite entertaining.

 

Holyfield against a 42 year old fat Foreman?

Entertaining fight. nothing more.

 

There not American

 

They didn't really, long term it ruined both, they've never been the same since.

To the OP the Klits hardly introduced dull heavyweight fights, Lennox Lewis' reign was dominant but for the most part very boring. maybe he had a bit more killer instinct but not by far.

 

This content is protected

 

I agree. Holyfield was a 2x linear champ in the HW division which makes him a real HW.

 

Klitschko Peter 1 was good

Vitali vs Lewis and Sanders and Arreola were good

Travis Walker vs Leapai was great

Arreola vs Travis Walker was great

Liahovich vs Brewster

Brewster Krasniqi

Chisora Helenius

Liahovich Helenius

Mesi was in some good fights

Huck vs Povetkin was very good

Klitschkos usually are just so dominant it cant be entertaining because no one is good enough to really make a fight of it

 

No you ****ing disrespectful *****. Holyfield wasnt a real hard hitter but he put Bowe on his ass and TKO'd Tyson. I'd say the man can hit harder than your average joe. And Foreman was the HW king after he won the legit title from Frazier. So yes he was once the best in his own era. Any man who says Foreman has overrated power is a disgrace. Ask Cooney,Briggs,Moorer,Norton,Wepner,Holyfield etc. You ****ing disgrace. You know nothing of this sport. And Holyfield wasnt the world champ then? He was the lineal champ you ****ing joke. Get off this site boy before you get spanked.