Is Tyson clearly hurt?

I realised he was hurt watching it live and no matter how many times I watch it now nobody can convince me he wasn't momentarily stunned from that shot.

 

Woah, hold on a minute.!
In the other thread, you were stating that the punch wasn't a head shot and that was the main issue!

Your exact words were :-

" I took it upon myself to slow the footage down. The right hand clearly makes no contact with Tyson's head. "

That should be the topic being discussed

 

Certainly not "clearly" hurt. Only if you hate Tyson, probably.

 

Where is the option in your poll for " The right hand clearly makes no contact with Tysons head " ?
That was the issue i was debating.

 

Where's the option "Who gives a ****"?

 

Lol.
How does " neither clear " relate in anyway to " The right hand clearly makes no contact with Tysons head ".
Talk about sidestepping!

 

Your first two options begin with " clearly lands to head "
Your third option " neither " obviously refers to the first two.
Nowhere have you provided an option for the point being debated, where you stated the punch clearly missed the head.

 

I think it clearly makes contact. As far as whether it hurts, I can make an argument either way based on what I want to see. If I don't want it to have hurt, I can see it as stuffed, perhaps even nearly abandoned as Holyfield had to shorten it while Tyson's head closed the distance. If I want it to have hurt, I can analogize it to the super-short shots that someone like Duran or Dempsey used to good effect.

 

You provide 3 options.....
1&2 both state that the punch clearly lands to head.....
Option 3 simply says, neither clear.....

Please explain how any of that relates to my contention of you stating:-

"" The right hand clearly makes no contact with Tysons head " ?

If i were you, i would stop digging that hole!

 

It definitely stung him. But he weathered it well.

Whether or not it hurt him might be down to semantics.