Is Tyson Fury still a prime fighter?

Discussion in 'British Boxing Forum' started by Wig, Jan 19, 2023.


How do you assess Fury’s current state

  1. Just entering his prime

  2. In his prime

  3. Past his prime

Results are only viewable after voting.
  1. fencik45

    fencik45 Well-Known Member Full Member

    2,916
    2,625
    Jun 6, 2022
    They both have garbage resumes. Whether you see someone beating Fury or not means nothing. As risk adverse as he is, he is looking to fight that mma goof as a way to age out Usyk.
     
  2. 08Horacio08

    08Horacio08 Member banned Full Member

    352
    218
    Jan 20, 2023
    lol Fury risk averse wtf
     
    SeanB1 likes this.
  3. Finkel

    Finkel Boxing Addict Full Member

    3,974
    4,730
    Feb 10, 2020
    Cheers. It never clicked that the Cunningham fight was at MSG. Makes sense now why Cunningham still can't accept the loss.
     
  4. Hattonmad

    Hattonmad Boxing Addict Full Member

    3,647
    4,841
    Jan 5, 2009
    I think physically Fury is definitely past prime. I don't think he's as light on his feet or as quick with his hands as he once was. However, I think Sugarhill has him punching harder than ever and he gains experience every time he enters the ring so he may be better than he's ever been. Whether you call that prime or past prime I don't know.
     
    jimmyonebomb likes this.
  5. jimmyonebomb

    jimmyonebomb Active Member Full Member

    892
    902
    Dec 5, 2010
    Wasnt in Big MSG though was it? Thought it was in the smaller theatre venue
     
    Finkel likes this.
  6. jcairns1

    jcairns1 Boxing Addict Full Member

    3,510
    283
    Feb 3, 2011
    His legs are shot, he still looks relatively fleet footed against plodders like Whyte and Chisora but the Usyk fight will show how far his footwork has slipped, he’s become a bit of a mauler now, jab, right hand, left hook and then tie up, be interesting if he fought Joe Joyce to see how that style matches up.
     
  7. SeanB1

    SeanB1 Well-Known Member banned Full Member

    2,392
    2,989
    Sep 8, 2022
    I loled too. I'm no Fury fanboy, I actually prefer AJ as a person despite his limitations in the ring, but Fury isn't risk averse at all. Traveled to Klitschko's adopted homeland to fight him, took the Wilder fight so much sooner than he had to, those two fights are the opposite of risk averse. Yes he's fought some rubbish people, but so has every top heavyweight. I don't think Fury or Joshua are risk averse. I don't think many top boxers are. I think sometimes the teams who live off them are but I honestly don't think many boxers are. They get punched in the head for a living, if they were risk averse they'd not be boxers.

    I'm risk averse hence being an office ***ker
     
  8. catchwtboxing

    catchwtboxing Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    27,169
    36,215
    Jul 4, 2014
    On his way out and he knows it.
     
  9. 08Horacio08

    08Horacio08 Member banned Full Member

    352
    218
    Jan 20, 2023
    Joshua is defo risk averse but aside from that ...

    spot on
     
    SeanB1 likes this.
  10. Finkel

    Finkel Boxing Addict Full Member

    3,974
    4,730
    Feb 10, 2020
    You are right. It was in the now Hulu Theatre. I'm sure it was still meaningful for the fighters to say they fought there. But it's not really on the same scale as when Canelo and Joshua did more recently.
     
    jimmyonebomb likes this.
  11. thistle

    thistle Boxing Addict Full Member

    7,321
    7,829
    Dec 21, 2016
    he never was, a completely tailored, protected & controlled career, sub-standard overall.