Is Tyson "Gypsy King" Fury unbeatable?

You are referring to senior citizens such as the 40 year old Luis Ortiz who will be entering the ring for the rematch with Deontay Wilder carrying an omron blood pressure monitor and riding a jazzy select elite power chair, right?

 

I would put my money on Fury over any of the top HW’s...Wilder and Joshua have the power to take him out but most likely get outboxed, Ruiz would be interesting because of his ring IQ and fast hands but the good little man usually loses to the good bigger man.

Fury’s the best HW right now, he’s deceptively good, but like any human on any given night, he’s beatable. Hopefully he keeps it together outside of the ring so it’s not he who defeats himself.

 

Dustin "Fry Cook" Nichols looked sensational in TKOing Andre "Beer" Brewer.

 

he is unbeatable against bums.

 

No. He is not unbeatable

 

Everyone is beatable on any given day. Especially in baaaxing.

 

Can?
Whyte, Joshua, Wilder, Ruiz, Joyce and a few others

Id make him favourite over all but they all can beat him

 

He technically should have lost against Wilder, if the ref counted correctly, so definitely not unbeatable.

But he is the best heavyweight at the moment.

 

He's not the best heavyweight.

I'd say he's third behind Ruiz logically, considering Fury should have had his win vs Wlad taken away, should have lost to Wilder.

Besides that who has he got on his resume to state he's the best Heavyweight?

Schwarz? Chisora? Seferi? Pineta?

Which one?

Nothing but unsubstantiated hype and myth and I can't wait for Wilder or even Joshua to put his lights out and put an end to this circus.

 

If you think Fury is some kind of phony I think you are hoping there. He soundly outboxed wilder, the count thing is grasping at straws, the fight result was the fight result, the ref did a great job.

 

No one is unbeatable.

 

I don't need to hope, the facts are already laid. His career is smoke and mirrors, myth and hype.

He did not soundly outbox Wilder, otherwise he wouldn't have been thought dead and wouldn't have required a ref deviating from the rule book to help him finish the fight.

If the ref gives a fighter additional time, which changes the entire result of the fight , leading that incident itself to become the defining moment of the fight, which Fury has now gone on to milk, how is it clutching at straws?

His biggest achievement to date is climbing back off the canvas with the help of a corrupt ref.

I've done an article on both the ref's serious breach of the rules along with the fact that Fury couldn't possibly have won the fight regardless, in fact a draw was kind in his favor.

Until now, no one could dispute any of the evidence because it was laden with facts.

 

Why?

What was your card?

People need to learn that the ten count isn't 10 seconds but the time it takes for the ref to count to 10
It's litterally in the name