He punishes his opponents and he will force the fight if he feels like.. I say he is pretty entertaining fighter..
Or none of the above. I've been entertained watching a few of his fights, but overall (in general) he's pretty ****ing boring, IMO. If you don't like it, you can go **** in your own mouth, ******.
He never goes all out, even against vastly inferior foes, he does damage but he is content to let his opponents walk into his shots, slowly busting them up rather than to come forward with bad intentions and flatten them
He is only boring when his opponant does not come to fight. Overall hes always looking for a KO and hes very active, and does not initiate clinches. What more could you want from him? He has his hands at his waiste and leans almost all the way into your face so you have a shot at hitting him.
yes wlad is absolute a boring fighter but vitali no. The Fights vs lennox sanders,Chisora,williams all good fights for me
The most exciting fighter is one with no defence, lots of power especially one punch knockout power and limited skills.
I dont see why wlad being boring affects how people view vitali? Vitali isnt boring at all he is awkward and might look clumsy at times because of his bad footwork and low hands but he isnt boring at all.
How is his footwork bad? Its different and unorthodox due to his kickboxing background but if his footwork was bad he would not be so good at always keeping perfect range. People need to stop associating orthodox = skilled, unorthodox = not skilled. He trips over once in a career vs Adamek and suddenly his footwork is bad, find me more HW with his "bad" lateral movement". If it was bad people would constantly be moving in and out of his reach. He rarely gets hit and thats mostly because of his footwork.