Is Ward really to blame for the fight happening at 168?

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by MVC, Aug 15, 2012.


Page 2 of 2
  1. turbotime

    turbotime Hall Of Famer Full Member

    42,571
    3,764
    May 4, 2012
    Pretty much this. Ward admitted to wanting the advantage.

    It's an advantage for Ward when it could have been a catchweight no matter how many blind eyes you turn to it.
     
    turbotime, Aug 15, 2012
    turbotime, Aug 15, 2012
    #16
  2. PrinceN

    PrinceN Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    17,987
    2
    Jul 24, 2011
    when has Mayweather ever called out a smaller fighter first?:deal he did say he would fight the prince once

    what about Broner he said he would fight Gamboa since people were asking him but go ahead list some names
     
    PrinceN, Aug 15, 2012
    PrinceN, Aug 15, 2012
    #17
  3. Lance_Uppercut

    Lance_Uppercut ESKIMO Full Member

    51,943
    2
    Jul 19, 2004
    It's only an advantage if it's a detriment to Dawson to make. Is it?
     
    Lance_Uppercut, Aug 15, 2012
    Lance_Uppercut, Aug 15, 2012
    #18
  4. |A|C|S|

    |A|C|S| Boxing Junkie banned

    12,964
    0
    Mar 7, 2012
    theres no one left for Ward to fight so he should be movin up anyway...
     
    |A|C|S|, Aug 15, 2012
    |A|C|S|, Aug 15, 2012
    #19
  5. Jaber

    Jaber Guest

    yes,Sven Warddke is to blame.this piece of **** doesn't fight unless he has all the advantage,home turf,horse shoes in his gloves,some nice peds from his friend Victor Conte,a referee like Jack Reiss who'll allow him to headbutt,some nice judges who don't watch the fight but give him all the rounds...pathetic
     
    Jaber, Aug 16, 2012
    Jaber, Aug 16, 2012
    #20
Page 2 of 2