Why did the OP point out Maussas 2 losses since Hatton but not Corelys (one of the Witter fights mentioned) 3 loses since Witter?
You're a Witter fan, not a Hatton hater?? So you're the guy who goes to Witter fights? Nice to finally meet you, I always wondered who he was. You might have more fans with you at his next fight, Froch's bringing some support for the main event.
I'm don't hate Hatton but I find Witter much more entertaining to watch. Witter - Slick boxing + heavy hands V Hatton - head down, charge, clinch, wrestle. No contest. Am I the only one that thinks like this?
Come on, you've had 20 minutes to come with that? You were right the first time. You're biased and too lazy to check your facts....:good
There's a bit of truth in that. I'm not too lazy to check the facts if it shows Witter in a good light/Hatton in a bad light.
Why dont we mention Morua whooped Maussas ass a year before Hatton fought him and Witter whooped Moruas ass (but Moruas a bum right?), what a great win Maussa was for Hatton
Lazcano is far more proven. I've seen Bradley fight and the guy isn't great. However, Lazcano at least has some good performances in his career. What does Bradley have? Nothing. Bradley was set up to lose against Castillo. If people want to discard the Castillo win for Hatton, what does it say that Bradley was supposed to a good record for Castillo's resume? Bradley is going nowhere. Lazcano has some redeeming attributes. Anyway, Hatton is number 1. He's still the man until he is beaten by a 140lber, moves up in weight or retires. None of those have happened yet.