Is Wlad an ATG?

A great, yes. ATG? No way.

 

3rd all time alreadty, chump.
:deal

 

Whatever makes you feel better.

 

That's what she said.

 

Crack kills.

 

Short Answer: No.

Easiest explanation: Viewing his fight against Povetkin.

 

The record books don't lie chumps. 16 straight defences, 10 KO's., 3rd all time. :deal

 

So who do you have at 1 and 2?

 

He's an ATG heavyweight. There is probably no case given his comp that would allow him to rank in the rop 100 p4p.

 

Another one who seemed to actually have enjoyed last weekends fiasco.

Talk about having low expectations.

 

#1 Ali #2 Louis


I said Wlad would retire #3, maybe just now he's top 10 so work still to do, although #3 for defences, nobody can change that except a future dominant force.

 

Wasn't his best defence I'll agree, but he won very easily as every MSM source reported.

 

Being a great isn't about being a number. Your're either a great fighter or you're not.

Ive watched most of Wlads fights and never have i seen him perform like one of the greatest fighters of all time. Skills and memorable fights are what matters.
Bull**** stats won't be remembered.

 

No argument from me, he was never in any danger of losing the fight whatsoever. I just wished he would have boxed/punched more and hugged/held less. I think had he done this he would have gotten either a TKO or a KO and fans like myself might have actually enjoyed the performance.

Too many on this site are happy that he simply won because they're on a childish quest to focus on this ATG rankings etc. But what about the way he went about winning?

that was such a bad fight I have zero interest in ever watching the guy fight again regarding of his ranking in history. This simply wasn't an enjoyable fight to watch. In fact I don't know if I'd even call that fiasco a fight.

 

Fixed that for ya