Is Wlad Klitschko a latter day Harry Wills?

Discussion in 'Classic Boxing Forum' started by janitor, Jul 13, 2008.


  1. Stonehands89

    Stonehands89 Boxing Junkie Full Member

    10,775
    312
    Dec 12, 2005
    ...He's out of his element, Janitor. Toad-boy is only comfortable drooling over Tyson or putting whoopie cushions on chairs and running away.
     
  2. ChrisPontius

    ChrisPontius March 8th, 1971 Full Member

    19,404
    278
    Oct 4, 2005
    Well i was more talking about his prime which was from somewhere 1915-1925. Johnson was old and fading, Willard was horrible, Dempsey avoided the #1 challenger for 7 years, Langford was a former middleweight and many other lightheavyweights were in the heavyweight rankings. To put it short, the talent in the 180+ pound division was pretty poor in terms of depth. Not in terms of quality of course, with Dempsey and Wills around.
     
  3. janitor

    janitor VIP Member Full Member

    71,599
    27,271
    Feb 15, 2006
    I think we are talking about diferent eras.

    Bill Tate was at his peak long before Dempsey was on the scene.

    On the light heavyweight isue I think there have been a good few light heavyweights who would have bee among the top half dozen heavyweights in any era.
     
  4. sp6r=underrated

    sp6r=underrated Member Full Member

    295
    0
    Jun 7, 2008
    If Langford was born today he would be bigger and Waldo wouldn't be as big if he was born a century earlier.
     
  5. Stonehands89

    Stonehands89 Boxing Junkie Full Member

    10,775
    312
    Dec 12, 2005
    We'll take Langford just as he is. He was knocking out HWs just as big as Wlad.
     
  6. sp6r=underrated

    sp6r=underrated Member Full Member

    295
    0
    Jun 7, 2008
    In general, do you disagree with the fact that a guy like Wlad wouldn't be as big if he had been born 100 years ago?
     
  7. Stonehands89

    Stonehands89 Boxing Junkie Full Member

    10,775
    312
    Dec 12, 2005
    Not necessarily. See Willard, Fulton, and Tate to begin with.
     
  8. ChrisPontius

    ChrisPontius March 8th, 1971 Full Member

    19,404
    278
    Oct 4, 2005
    I don't really see the relevance of this point anyway. He's living right now, deal with it.
     
  9. mcvey

    mcvey VIP Member Full Member

    97,745
    29,126
    Jun 2, 2006
    Youre first instinct would be more interesting ,I think.!
     
  10. janitor

    janitor VIP Member Full Member

    71,599
    27,271
    Feb 15, 2006
     
  11. SuzieQ49

    SuzieQ49 The Manager Full Member

    37,077
    3,733
    Sep 14, 2005

    :lol: :lol: LMAO, i didnt know u had a funny side stonehands! :rofl
     
  12. SuzieQ49

    SuzieQ49 The Manager Full Member

    37,077
    3,733
    Sep 14, 2005

    The Author of unforgiveable blackness told me personally tunney was veiwed as an elitist snob, and that he was a huge racist.
     
  13. SuzieQ49

    SuzieQ49 The Manager Full Member

    37,077
    3,733
    Sep 14, 2005
    I still dont think wlad has faced a real skilled REAL HEAVYWEIGHT boxer. If he outboxes alexander potvekin and nicolay valuev clearly and cleanly, I will totally sucumb to this thread and admit his skill is top teir and he deserves mention for top 20.
     
  14. Stonehands89

    Stonehands89 Boxing Junkie Full Member

    10,775
    312
    Dec 12, 2005
    As an older man, Tunney was a little regretful about his image as a fighter. He did come off as elitest and dismissive to the media, but also gave a speech about Shakespeare at a university. He was extremely well read and suprisingly intellectual.

    He was very strategic minded about boxing, perhaps as much as if not more than Leonard was in the 80s. Great strategists both. Tunney consulted with Benny Leonard before the Greb rematch and got some worthwhile tips about how to beat the Windmill.
     
  15. McGrain

    McGrain Diamond Dog Staff Member

    113,040
    48,159
    Mar 21, 2007
    Klitschko-Langford is a pretty horrible match up for Wlad in my estimation, partly for the reasons you've indentified, but mainly because of Klit's style. Klitschko feels he can only fight one way - the way he's been fighting this past year - and that would leave Langford in the contest for the duration. Yes, Langford would be getting picked off and hurt, probably badly, but he is a live threat every moment he is in there.

    If it goes to points it's only going one way. But if there's a KO, it's only going one way, Sam's way.