Is Wladimir better at controlling range than Lennox was ?

Discussion in 'Classic Boxing Forum' started by rm36, Jun 26, 2009.


  1. zadfrak

    zadfrak Boxing Junkie Full Member

    8,513
    3,111
    Feb 17, 2008
    lennox himself had a jab that was tough to counter. Very tough. That makes him a hard guy to deal with. It's not as if there is some huge gap between the 2 on any sort of scale. It's a small difference, but a difference. Some of the early Lewis bouts were the one's he was countered more often. And it wasn't as if Wlad didn't have a terrific jab/distance in his early bouts either.

    Both guys create distance very very well and usually this board likes comparisons of polar opposites and not similar abilities.

    I sent away for fights from both guys and watched their careers develop from A to Z. I've never seen anyone counter the Klitschko jab in 55 fights. And he's even faced his share of counterpunchers and southpaws. I watched the Holmes career from the beginning and his jab did get countered. I use to think the Lennox Lewis jab was the most difficult to counter since Ali. You just don't see it happening. And it just makes it so tough to deal with when those guys just don't leave an "opportunity window". But Wlad overtook Lennox by a small increment. Be that as it may, whenever a guy cannot possibly counter a top heavyweight jab, they are going to be in for a very tough night's work and victories are going to be tough to come by.
     
  2. Mendoza

    Mendoza Hrgovic = Next Heavyweight champion of the world. banned Full Member

    55,255
    10,354
    Jun 29, 2007

    I would agree. to control range you need speed, activity, height, arm length, solid footwork and the threat of power behind each blow.

    Lewis sometimes forgot to use his jab. Wlad never has.
     
  3. ChrisPontius

    ChrisPontius March 8th, 1971 Full Member

    19,404
    278
    Oct 4, 2005
    Fair post all-round, though i'd like to point out on viewing them A-Z, i think Klitschko has just passed the R. He's got a few years left.
     
  4. rm36

    rm36 Active Member Full Member

    1,311
    8
    Jun 26, 2009
    We never saw any of those against Lewis (at least not at their best) either.
     
  5. PowerPuncher

    PowerPuncher Loyal Member Full Member

    42,723
    269
    Jul 22, 2004
    Well Wladdy has easier opponents and he doesn't look to take opponents out as much as Lewis did, Lewis liked to brawl a bit at times too
     
  6. BOGART

    BOGART Boxing Junkie Full Member

    8,903
    259
    Jul 19, 2004
    Yes he is but there are a couple things to note. Lewis fought better competition and Wlad's gameplan relies more on the jab. Lewis adapted more during his fights while Wlad sticks to his jab first and often gameplan. I think a lot of what makes Wlad so jab happy is his low confidence in his chin. I think he jabs to keep his opponents totally at bay and it works beautifully. Both had excellent jabs but I think Wlad's is a bit quicker and its a bigger part of his game. But if they were to have ever fought I think Lewis would have gotten Wlad out of there within 5-6 rounds. If they were to have gotten into a battle of jabs I think Wlad would win that. Lewis would recognise this and go for the kill like he did with Grant and Golota.
     
  7. BritInvasion

    BritInvasion keepin on keepin on Full Member

    763
    28
    May 7, 2008
    I think because all Wlad does is stay at distance he appears to be 'better' at it than other elites. If Wlad actually tried to get fighters out of there he'd have to come inside more. If other top top fighters never did anything else, like Wlad of late, then they'd look equally impressive at dictating the distance.
     
  8. JohnThomas1

    JohnThomas1 VIP Member

    52,858
    44,580
    Apr 27, 2005
    Well lets expand. I'd like to see Wlad control the range against the likes of Rudduck, Tyson (yes the one Lewis fought), Holyfield (same) and all his better opponents.

    I really don't think that highly of Wlad's opposition.
     
  9. JohnThomas1

    JohnThomas1 VIP Member

    52,858
    44,580
    Apr 27, 2005
    Imagine what Lewis would have done to Wlad's bunch.

    :!:
     
  10. DamonD

    DamonD Boxing Junkie Full Member

    14,285
    39
    Nov 19, 2004
    Peter wouldn't have scored any knockdowns, for one thing.
     
  11. TheGreatA

    TheGreatA Boxing Junkie Full Member

    14,241
    157
    Mar 4, 2009
    Peter would have been crushed by Lewis' uppercut, except Lewis would actually finish him unlike McCline. It's the one punch that Wladimir doesn't really utilize and recently his great left hook hasn't been seen a whole lot either.

    I guess it proves how dominant Wladimir is over his opposition since he doesn't have to use much more than a jab and the occasional right hand.
     
  12. JohnThomas1

    JohnThomas1 VIP Member

    52,858
    44,580
    Apr 27, 2005

    Yeah but we have to be fair and temper that. Lennox had his two losses too, i'm willing to overlook some of Wlad's drama's earlier as he seems to be much improved. I do think at his best Lewis would have blown most out of the water. It's a poor bunch compared to Lewis' IMO.
     
  13. Mantequilla

    Mantequilla Boxing Addict Full Member

    4,964
    78
    Aug 26, 2004
    I never saw that much in Lewis' jab.It could be heavy, but all too often had all the snap and pace of an old man reaching up for a tin of soup from a shelf.I'm not sure i would even have it a top ten British fighters jab list, yet it seems to be considered one of the heavyweight greats?.I dunno...

    I don't think Lewis or Wlad have fought hardly any competent counterpunchers that can even semi consistently take advantage of lazy jabs.Certainly not Chris Byrd.It's mostly been a bunch of punchers and unskilled labourers.
     
  14. JohnThomas1

    JohnThomas1 VIP Member

    52,858
    44,580
    Apr 27, 2005
    What fighters would you bracket as having the ability to counter effectively and consistently against such size?
     
  15. rm36

    rm36 Active Member Full Member

    1,311
    8
    Jun 26, 2009
    Razor is a question mark. Since Lewis, in a very good performance, bombed him out, it's difficult comparing in terms of jab. But, I think Wladimir could find a rhythm and keep Ruddock at bay. I think Klitschko would have beat the washed up Tyson (though it might have been a decision win), and he probably could have taken the decision over those versions of Evander.

    The best comparison in terms of controlling range might be to just consider who could function best on just the jab and right hand through out a fight.