Is Wladimir Klitschko a top 10 HW of all time? - Please remember to vote

Thats very cruel because its simply not true.The only fight Wlad has truly lost,and when i say lost i mean overwhelmed was against Sanders.The first Brewster fight Wlad was dominant for the first 4 rounds,arguably putting on the performance of his career before gassing.He gassed,he wasnt knocked out,the scans revealed no concussion.Brewster was extremly lucky to win that fight,he was getting his **** well and truly pushed in by a physically superior fighter,maybe the Vegas heat which is always cruel on European fighters helped him.Vlad dispatched Brewster with ease in the rematch which he should have done first time.

He was a baby in the Purrity fight,and again it was another fight he was dominating before succumbing to exhaustion which could be put down to inexperience.

As for Wladimir not beating anyone?I think he has beaten some good opponents.The young fresh Sam Peter of 2005 was a good fighter.At the time people were predicting he would knock Wlad out and if the Klits werent around i think this big 250 lb Nigerian would have unleashed a reign of terror on the division.Had he beat Wlad ,a [fight in which he gave Wlad problems [in the eliminator,he would have murdered Byrd probably Ibeabuchi style and then i dont see too many guys that would have beaten him and the US sports media which views the Black athlete as the ultimate ATHLETE,THE DON,would have been all over his nutsack:yep

 

i think the point is that losing to horrible competition is ONE of the things counting against Wlad. Yes Tyson and Lewis both lost to horrible opposition, but they made up for that in other areas that Wlad hasn't

 

atsch he has been the most dominant champ in history ****** .

 

atsch VLAD has dominated most comprehencivly the either of them so what the **** is you"re point ?

 

:deal

 

can't you ****ing read?
Where did I say he didn't dominate?!

In fact, I posted that one of the things IN his favour is the fact that he dominated his era.

also learn to spell you dick

 

"Not early enough" is a special knock that only Wlad gets (after knocking people the **** out). It's an unprecedented chief criticism that no other fighter has faced over the course of his reign.

It makes you wonder if it's utter bull**** spawned by a lack of valid criticisms.

 

In any order these ten at the moment are ranked above him but he has a chance to enter the top 10 before he's done

Ali
Holmes
Lewis
Foreman
Louis
Tyson
Marciano
Fraizer
Holyfield
Tunney

 

top 15 now, top 10 before he retires

 

That is a horrible list, you clearly know nothing about boxing. atsch

 

No way Tunney ranks above Wlad. You could elect Liston, maybe Charles, but not Tunney. Holyfield also IMO ranks below Wlad; he never dominated, lost the trilogy against Bowe, didn't know when to quit, was too inconsistant in fights against old Holmes and old Foreman, etc.

 

My list thats how i see and i dont care if you agree or not because its all subject to debate anyway jackass

 

Holyfield beat Tyson twice, Foreman,Holmes, Young Mercer,and Bowe

 

holyfield in my opinion is still above wlad. the tyson wins, decisive dominance over (mediocre) lineal champion douglas, clear victories against a still relevant foreman and still tricky holmes put him in a different place.

no matter how you slice it, holyfield is 4-1-1 against other top 10 heavyweights, which is a damn fine record

 

For the ones who voted no..list the fighters you list over him please