Ishe Smith Vs. Danny Jacobs

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by Hatesrats, Aug 22, 2009.


  1. Hatesrats

    Hatesrats "I'm NOT Suprised..." Full Member

    60,376
    241
    Sep 28, 2007
    Anyone smell an (On Paper) upset?
    Could turn out to be another bad styles match-up, IMO.
    For a young fighter.
     
  2. gambleer

    gambleer Well-Known Member Full Member

    2,714
    228
    Sep 28, 2007
    If Jacobs makes this fight close, he will get the decision.
    Ishe has never won controversial fights.
     
  3. sues2nd

    sues2nd Fading into Bolivian... Full Member

    9,760
    8
    Aug 7, 2004
    Jacobs by SD. He is busier and is the better composite puncher than Ishe...meaning, if rounds are close, he will get them.
     
  4. nezy37

    nezy37 Boxing Addict Full Member

    5,241
    0
    Jul 13, 2007
    I'd love to see it, I don't like Jacobs.

    Apparently Max does though, he needs to remove his mouth from Jocobs ****
     
  5. Marnoff

    Marnoff Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    25,227
    27
    Feb 14, 2006
    It's a hell of a fight thus far.
     
  6. JM22

    JM22 Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    16,487
    6
    Jun 5, 2008
    For a Smith fight am impress.
     
  7. ChrisKim47

    ChrisKim47 Active Member Full Member

    1,246
    0
    May 22, 2009
    Smith landed every meaningful punch. And he did it often enough in my opinion.
     
  8. nezy37

    nezy37 Boxing Addict Full Member

    5,241
    0
    Jul 13, 2007
    nah, Jacobs clearly won this, not 100-89 but he won.
     
  9. nervousxtian

    nervousxtian Trolljegeren Full Member

    14,049
    1,098
    Aug 6, 2005
    I can't be the only one who thought Smith took that fight.

    Those punch-stats were bull****, Jacobs landed less than 10% of his shots, he was hit arms, gloves, and back all night.

    100-89? Are you ****ing kidding me?
     
  10. GoldenArms

    GoldenArms Well-Known Member banned Full Member

    2,326
    242
    Jan 24, 2009
    I thought it was a 96-94 type fight. I haven't been impressed with Jacobs since his opponents have gone up in class. He only looks good beating up on cans.

    Not a good sign imo when a light puncher that's moving up in weight like Ishe is stalking Jacobs all night and landing the more hurtful punches...
     
  11. jordan1

    jordan1 Juan Lopez #1 Full Member

    11,491
    30
    Jun 20, 2009
    Agree, not a good sign at all...
     
  12. ChrisKim47

    ChrisKim47 Active Member Full Member

    1,246
    0
    May 22, 2009
    Nah I thought Smith did enough as well. Jacobs was pawing his jab all night and using his head as a shield.
     
  13. Marnoff

    Marnoff Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    25,227
    27
    Feb 14, 2006
    Smith gave away too many rounds for inactivity. Then add in the point deduction. I didn't score the fight, but with a general look at it Jacobs was the winner.
     
  14. Ricky369

    Ricky369 Boxing Junkie Full Member

    9,468
    144
    Feb 16, 2008
    Not 100-89. But the victory was pretty clear. Smith doesn't listen to his ****ing corner
     
  15. lefty

    lefty Boxing Addict Full Member

    5,802
    2
    Apr 29, 2006
    I didn't see this fight but i've seen Jacobs before and i didn't think much at all, i thought he lost against a journeyman but he won a shutout on the cards, i watched the fight with no volume and jacobs looks like he paws out every punch