It is funny how the hating is being set up like a straight right behind a good jab...

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by gatorbama, Jan 21, 2010.


  1. Starched Him

    Starched Him Boxing Junkie Full Member

    9,681
    61
    Feb 5, 2009
    hu? shane was the boxer forrest was the puncher forrest was coming forward and it was forrest job to cut the ring off shane job was to slip out with minimum damage.

    your making **** up and your mother has autism
     
  2. 3rdIslander

    3rdIslander GURU R.I.P. Full Member

    1,744
    1
    Nov 7, 2009
    B.S.

    I'm a Mayweather fan. I'm a fan of skill.

    What I'm not a fan of is ungracious arrogance. Skill & arrogance don't have to be conjoined.

    A star boxer cannot continue to belittle upcoming opponents, then beat them, then compliment them after having beaten them, & THEN expect to get no criticism for this behavior.
     
  3. time

    time Well-Known Member Full Member

    1,525
    7
    Dec 18, 2009
    Im not happy about the floyd v pac fight being off either, and i think pac should have taken the 14 day cut off, but i still believe him when he says hes clean. He should have taken the blood tests but at the end of the day its not the mayweathers who call the shots on fight rules, pac didnt break any rules and if he feels that taking blood will affect him and his performance against floyd (and he would need to be at 100% to even have a small chance against him) then thats a pity he feels that way. He should have taken the terms and ended speculation but he will have to live with that now and all the talk until he does agree to more tests.

    Ive heard floyd and his team say several times that floyd beats pac with or without his ped's, so why not just take the 24 days and do just that?? Is the 10 days so important to floyd, as it obviously is to pac??