It's a shame Wlad is not fighting Dimitrenko...

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by RonnieHornschuh, Jul 4, 2009.


Page 2 of 2
  1. Ivo

    Ivo Boxing Addict Full Member

    6,351
    81
    Jul 20, 2004
    This loss could be for Dimitrenko's own good. Wladimir would have crushed him so badly. So in a way it is good for Dimitrenko that he will not face Wladimir next.
     
    Ivo, Jul 5, 2009
    Ivo, Jul 5, 2009
    #16
  2. Feiti

    Feiti Active Member Full Member

    1,312
    0
    Jul 31, 2004
    I think Chambers will provide a good fight for Wlad, but still lose. He´s amassed a pretty good record, with wins over Brock, Peter, Dimitrenko and the close fight against Povetkin.

    He should easily beat the joke Valuev and I´d put Chambers at #3 in the HW division, since Haye is still pretty much unproven there still.
     
    Feiti, Jul 5, 2009
    Feiti, Jul 5, 2009
    #17
  3. djm

    djm Boxing Addict Full Member

    3,208
    2
    Dec 17, 2006
    It's a shame we didn't have a 1-sided drubbing that proves nothing about either fighter (after all, everyone is losing badly to WK these days) as opposed to a fast boxer re-asserting his place in the division with a gutsy decision to fight in another guy's back yard? Not to mention that it was two top-10 guys actually meeting!

    Your point is title fight mismatches are good? Strange thought.
     
    djm, Jul 5, 2009
    djm, Jul 5, 2009
    #18
Page 2 of 2