How about you tell me who else from 96 and up can't beat the Fab 4. Like imagine Golovkin trying to fight one of these monsters, he'd be knocked out in two by Hearns, Hagler, and Leonard, he might last 3 with Duran if he lucky. Poor Pacquiao doesn't make out out the dressing before he's KO'd just by the thought of fighting the Fab 4. Then there is Cotto, Oscar, Shane, Canelo, Margarito, Maidana, Trinidad, Martinez, .....they would just be tune ups and irrelevant on the Fab 4 resume.
You mean Pacquiao can't beat GOAT level Welters and Middleweights? Really going out on a limb here. Nobody thinks Pac can win. He's too small, dumbass.
So why is the boxing world constantly trying to put Pacquiao on a pedestal? Kellerman just said he is the best of this era...They argue Manny is better Floyd yet it's Floyd who constantly gets rated and compared in fantasy matches with GOATS
http://cdn2-b.examiner.com/sites/de...57a196c171607fe3ac730334612.jpg?itok=34PN7egA http://photos1.blogger.com/blogger/1320/864/320/pacquiao-1.jpg http://cdn.bleacherreport.net/image...000/630/191/pac-marq1_original.png?1354200491
Go back even further. Back to the 1950s . The Onion farmer eats Floyd up for breakfast , lunch and diner.
Another thread? What is wrong with you man! Seriously, you're behaving like a small child. All this just because a few of us have said Floyd couldn't have beaten Ray and Tommy. Sort yourself out. It's pathetic. Just for the record, GG would have had a much better shot at beating the Fab Four. Why? Because it's all about styles and attributes. Overall, Floyd is a much better fighter than GG. But GG is much bigger and more powerful than Floyd, which would have given him a much better chance. Also, GG would have fought those guys at the higher weights, where they wouldn't have been as effective. Now read that again and take it on board. Stop taking things to heart. Not everyone who criticises Floyd or has him losing fantasy fights hates him.