Its been done before, it'll be done again wtf! Best rankings body

The most prestigious title? WBC

Or most accurate rankings? IBO

The WBO is just a joke - for reasons of which I am sure we are all aware
The WBA has the bull**** regular/super champ BS
The IBF sticks to it's rules the best, but enforces shockingly bad mandatories

 

It's between Ring Mag and Fightnews for me with ESPN coming 3rd.

 

Ringmag for me i suppose

 

IBO usually get it right. The Ring mag is way too taken up with the American hype machine. They only give recognition to guys that go over there. Plus now it is owned by GoldenBoy I will not trust it one bit.

 

What I don't get is how the IBO and Boxrec both do computerised rankings yet Boxrecs are total **** compared to the IBO's.

 

Depends what you ask the computer to do really?

I'll vote IBO.

Scrap all the others and keep them.

 

WBO is the best looking to have on your mantlepiece.

If I won the English title I'd throw it in the fire.

 

WTF?

Surely the green belt is better than a belt that has Warren's knob cheese all over it????

The English title belt looks awful - the BBBoC need to scrap it, concentrate on British title fights.

 

The WBO is classy looking piece of leather. I'm sure its made out of the finest cow hide.

The Green belt is okay, but it hints at being mouldy.

 

More like old English vinyl.........

 

All fall in the same bracket really. One week they'll do soemthing surprisingly decent only to be followed by a month of **** decisions. I normally go by the Ring rankings.

 

For rankings, The Ring by mile.