If slow-ass novices like Chisora and Charr can get to Vitali, Haye can easily. No way this fight gets made now.
I don't think Haye would stick his hands up and walk into Vitali's fists like Charr did... completely different styles... he'd circle Vitali, throw 3 punches a round and lose a 11-1 decision at best
Both Charr and Chisora were managing to counter Vitali at times, and Haye wouldn't be afraid of Vitali's arm punches like he was wary of Wlad's right hand. Even if it were a case of styles make fights, Vitali has declined so much it hardly matters either way, he's just too slow after a couple of rounds.
I don't get why some of u guys think haye will beat him, when he fought his brother all he did was lay on the floor trying to get a point deducted or stall. The ref called it a knockdown and that ended that. He couldn't get in close and it was one sloppy ugly performance by him. Being in the U.S. this was one of his first fights aired over her and a poor lackluster one a that. The great haye will never win that fight if he ever gets it.
Wlad is the harder puncher of the two, and is much quicker than Vitali. I admit I would have given Haye no chance against Vitali 3-4 years ago and I've said it here, but Vitali is looking his age now.
Sadly i have to agree. Although that doesn't make us correct. Funny thing is , he's dominating still. but the the reaction speed, and speed in general is leaving him..""' He beat Charr hands down and easy, but I can tell, even as a Klitschko fan, age is catching up"" Just sad, that the rest of the boxing world, can't wait, and are expecting his age to be the reason behind him losing.
haye ducked Vitali for years ,because he knew he had no chance ,but sure that britbum might have a chance against 41 yo Vitali and his chances will be even better if he waits another 9 years. 33yo Vitali would have killed David Gaye.