Its crazy Golovkin probably hits harder then Kovalev

Well it is hard to take someone seriously by posting such drivel. WHO did Cotton beat to take the lineal 160 belt? A washed up injured Martinez, who retired afterwards. Murray actually BEAT Martinez but was robbed atschCotto beating Martinez does not in any sway ignify he can defeat the rest of Golovkin's opponents at middleweight, UNLESS they were drained. Geale was drained, it was like fighting a corpse. :-(

 

Mirkofilipovic cro cop ,hmmmm.....:good. I would expect such bias rubbish from you...

 

So you are saying Cro Cop is biased?

 

Yeah, the poster! Meaning you...:tired

 

NOPE :bart I speak facts Brutha.

 

lol I don't care if you take me seriously or not. After reading your opinions in the above post, I won't take you very seriously going forward.

 

There is about 0% probability, that a middleweight with reach of 175 cm could extract as much power in his punch as a light heavy with 185 cm reach.

 

That's what she said.

Seriously though, I could care less about your approval :deal

:hi:

 

Not facts at all, merely opinion. A BIASED ONE at that!

 

LOL when discussing something as subjective as boxing, you call me biased :nut The problem is, I do not worship your overhyped yank heroes, as a matter of fact, you yanks tend to overhype EVERYTHING that comes out of that country, Bruce Lee according to you yanks, can destroy anyone in a street fight atsch

 

It's all relative.

GiGi loses to an old Bernard Hopkins.

 

I doubt that his punches in a real fight are harder than Kovalev's. Gennady never puts his whole weight/effort into his punches which is why he never loses his balance. Kovalev seems to put more weight in some of his punches and loses balance quite often.

 

He does hit harder than most of super middles and many of LHWs. Kovalev, Strevenson and Beterbiev are not among those LHWs.

 

Golovkin clearly has much more punching power than Wlad😊